BIDEN'S 'LONG COVID' PLAN BUILDS THE FUNDING CASE — The president's order that the Health and Human Services Department assemble a cross-government long Covid strategy consolidates a rapidly growing plan under the health secretary. But in many ways, the plan is another reprise of the same song: We need more coronavirus funds, because this isn't going away soon. What's happening: The effort launched Tuesday afternoon aims to broaden research, detection and treatment access to fight lingering or late-emerging effects of coronavirus infection that impacts between seven and 23 million Americans, according to some estimates. Those symptoms can range from brain fog to shortness of breath, heart irregularities and kidney problems, making it difficult for doctors to categorize and track long Covid prevalence and needs. What they're asking for: Many of the initiatives the plan lays out are built into the $82 billion the White House has requested for coronavirus efforts in fiscal year 2023. That includes $25 million to build on CDC's surveillance program and $20 million to establish a Centers of Excellence. There's also an effort to set up long Covid clinics, accelerate trial enrollment and boost provider education to properly identify and bill long Covid cases (as opposed to a range of chronic conditions it can resemble). The consolidated plan comes amid building anxiety among federal health officials and patient advocates that Congress is losing interest in short-term funding needs, let alone preparedness efforts and sprawling long-term initiatives without defined parameters — like tackling long Covid. More on that in a moment... In the meantime, hospital groups have urged HHS to better define long Covid and how to treat it before ending the public health emergency, an early sign of potential coverage and billing battles to come. BURSTS OF COVID CASH AREN'T ENOUGH — That's the concern of many Democrats and public health advocates as senators near a vote on $10 billion in pandemic aid that the administration has warned won't last through October, POLITICO's Alice Miranda Ollstein and Erin Banco write. That means bitterly divided lawmakers will have to debate again soon. This round of funding — if it can pass the House and Senate — would help restart key Covid-19 programs that recently ran out of resources, including the development of future variant-specific vaccines and purchasing more treatments. But it's a fraction of the administration's original $30 billion request. "I would think they'd have to be back in 60 to 90 days," Sen. Roy Blunt of Missouri, the Senate's top GOP health care appropriator, told POLITICO. "I don't think anyone thinks it will last through the summer, and maybe doesn't last until the summer." Yet building a coalition for more funding is getting harder with a tight congressional calendar heading into the midterms, ongoing pandemic fatigue and partisan disagreements over whether and how much to spend on both the domestic and international public health emergency, Alice and Erin write. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer was quick to note the need for more "later this spring," saying this deal "is well short of what is truly needed to keep us safe." That next bill, Schumer argued, should also meet international needs, and combine global Covid aid with more funding for Ukraine and to address food insecurity around the world. DOCTORS, PATIENTS WANT TELEHEALTH TO CONTINUE ACROSS STATE BORDERS — A Morning Consult poll on telehealth published today finds that health care providers and patients alike support telehealth practitioners being able to operate across state lines as the pandemic moves into a less critical phase. Many states have ended or are planning to end waivers they enacted during the health crisis that allowed health care providers to care for patients in other states. One in five practitioners polled say they have provided health care services across state lines under an emergency waiver program. Now eight in 10 health care providers support being able to practice telehealth across state lines, and the majority also believe cutting off that ability will have a negative impact on patients' health, access to care, and safety. More than 75 percent of patients also support the option to seek telehealth care outside their state.
|
Comments
Post a Comment