Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories. NOW WHAT? The lawmakers' letter stopped short of calling for what the business lobby has been seeking on the foreign tax credit regulations — a one year delay of the rules, which went into effect this year. Businesses say that would give them more time to comply with the complicated regulations that are only made trickier by all the moving pieces happening on the international tax scene these days — most notably, the global tax deal that the Biden administration helped across the finish line last year, which could face implementation issues here in the U.S. and in a variety of other places. But it's also true that the extra time would allow for more lobbying to make the rules more business-friendly. The National Foreign Trade Council, one of the first groups to call for that one-year delay, said as much in a letter about two months ago. That kind of pause, the group wrote to Yellen, would allow for "any reasoned reconsideration" of the rules, particularly in how they interact with potential changes caused by the global agreement. Key Democrats previously have said that business groups should have raised more of a stink about the draft regulations, though lobbyists say that the final rules contained significant updates and that the corporate community did lodge some complaints about the draft rules. In any event, there had been some signals in previous months that Treasury would engage with the business community on the rules, as outlets like Tax Notes reported. But it might be getting close to do-or-die time for businesses seeking a delay to the regulations, which have already been in effect for four full months. WELL, THAT'S SOMETHING: Practically every Democrat in Congress right now wanted to preserve the expansion of the Child Tax Credit that the party enacted in its 2021 pandemic relief bill, which authorized monthly payments of up to $300 per child for qualifying families. But they didn't, because of the opposition of Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.). And according to a new book, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnellwould have been nothing but thrilled about that outcome, as Insider's Joseph Zeballos-Roig reports. McConnell had been afraid that if Americans got used to benefits like the monthly child allowances, it would be very difficult for Republicans to strip them away when they took back power, as The New York Times' Jonathan Martin and Alexander Burns write in their new book "This Will Not Pass." Democrats are still trying to salvage a slimmed-down version of President Joe Biden's Build Back Better agenda, which would have extended the expanded CTC for another year under the version that passed the House last year. Manchin, who forced Democrats to abandon that measure, was particularly skeptical of the expanded CTC, calling for work requirements and even suggesting that parents would use their payments to buy drugs. But it's worth noting that McConnell's view of the situation — that voters would both get used to and want to keep social benefit programs if Democrats could only keep them in law for awhile — was shared by many Democrats, which is why they tried to pack lots of initiatives into the BBB on a short-term basis.
|
Comments
Post a Comment