Hello there! I'm Eleanor Mueller and I report on labor for POLITICO. I've written extensively about paid leave, child care, and other policies that shape the way women work – so it made sense for me to fill in for Katie this week with this dispatch on how the private sector is responding to the Roe v. Wade news. I'd love to hear your thoughts: Don't hesitate to email me at emueller@politico.com or find me on Twitter at @eleanor_mueller. See you next time! Mike Draper owns a clothing company, RAYGUN, that employs around 100 full- and part-time workers spread across four states: Iowa, Missouri, Nebraska and Illinois. When POLITICO reported last week that the Supreme Court had voted to overturn Roe v. Wade, it hit him: "Three out of four of those states would move to ban abortion if given the chance. "I'm not one of those people that says, 'I'm going to pack up and leave,'" Draper, 39, said. "I was born six blocks from the store, so Iowa is my state as much as it is anybody else's. It's on me to try to work to create a state that is once again welcoming." Draper is part of a mounting wave of employers who are starting to think about how they can protect their workers' access to abortion as the nation's highest court prepares to clear the way for states to enact laws restricting the procedure. Amazon, Levi's, Yelp and Microsoft are among the latest companies to announce new policies that would help those on their payroll maintain access to abortion, including by reimbursing employees for related travel costs. "I give credit to the business community that stepped up and said, 'We're not going to allow our workers to struggle with something that is fundamentally health care,'" National Partnership for Women and Families President Jocelyn Frye said. Abortion rights supporters warn against becoming too reliant on the private sector for protecting access to abortion because companies are not obligated to maintain these kinds of policies — and they may, in some instances, reverse them if they encounter pushback from anti-abortion forces like those that have targeted employers in the past. Corporations are "not an incredibly reliable and consistent support on any one issue," Noreen Farrell, civil rights attorney and executive director of Equal Rights Advocates, said. "It's important to engage corporations where we can … but we can't rely on corporations for our fundamental constitutional rights or our economic empowerment." For employers like Draper, it's a matter of social responsibility to make sure their workers continue to have access to abortion. For others, economic factors may be at play as well. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen on Tuesday said that banning abortion would be "very damaging" for the economy by constraining women's labor force participation. Access to abortion increased the probability a woman would work 40 weeks or more per year by almost 2 percentage points, according to the Institute for Women's Policy Research. "To increase economic growth, the Treasury Secretary tells us we need women to be workers," Erika Bachiochi, author of The Rights of Women and a legal scholar at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, tweeted this week. "For women to be workers, they can't be mothers too for then we'd have to change how we think about everything. And that's no good." In an email, Bachiochi raised questions about why companies might want to protect employee access to abortion. "It's not at all surprising that corporations are offering to pay for their employees' abortions — a far cheaper option than accommodations for parenting," Erika Bachiochi, said. "Why not invest instead in the culturally (and economically) essential work their employees do as parents? Easy answer: Abortion is far better for the bottom line." And some say employers are overreaching by protecting their workers' access to the procedure. "This sounds to me like some executive or corporate board members are getting way, way beyond the purpose of their business," David N. O'Steen, executive director for the National Right to Life Committee, said. "It's to provide a product." Some of this blowback has already materialized for companies.Citigroup , for instance, implemented its abortion travel reimbursement policy before the Supreme Court news, writing in a March 15 SEC filing that "in response to changes in reproductive health care laws in certain states in the U.S., beginning in 2022 we provide travel benefits to facilitate access to adequate resources." The bank has since faced fallout from GOP lawmakers, with dozens of House Republicans calling for the government to cancel its federal contracts. RAYGUN is wary of such pushback, particularly in red states like Iowa where it is based. "I don't really know how loud a company like RAYGUN," whose headquarters are "only a few blocks from the Iowa state capitol, really wants to broadcast how much we would support paying for abortions in a state where they might pass restrictive laws next," Draper said. "Even if those laws get overturned, they're going to look for somebody to make an example of." As a result, the company has said that its policy for protecting workers' access to abortion will remain informal. "It's not something that we've sat down to write out," Draper said. "For us, it's letting people know that there's flexibility in it." Some private-sector employers have instead focused on how to use their resources to advocate for protecting abortion access nationally — for instance, by supporting the Women's Health Protection Act, which would have banned states from enacting many kinds of abortion restriction and which the Senate failed to advance this week. Chicago-based flower delivery service Flowers for Dreams recruited its workers in its call center — where staffing levels were more robust than usual in preparation for Mother's Day — to target senators "that are on the fence or voted against" the legislation. "Our first instinct was — instead of throwing up our hands and saying, 'How can we now make this new reality work for our staff?' [was instead to ask] 'How can we prevent this new reality from happening in the first place?" CEO Steven Dyme, 31, said.
|
Comments
Post a Comment