Welcome to POLITICO's West Wing Playbook, your guide to the people and power centers in the Biden administration. Send tips | Subscribe here | Email Alex | Email Max JOE BIDEN's response to an avowed racist killing 10 people at a predominantly Black Buffalo grocery store has been defined, in part, by what's been left unsaid. The president has not shamed specific individuals who spread the "replacement theory" dogma that warped the shooter's mind. Instead, he's admonished institutions that push the idea that elites are facilitating the mass migration of minorities to dilute the power of white Americans. But to judge Biden by this standard alone would miss something more important. The language he's using is incredibly pointed and descriptive for a president. It reflects a sobriety inside the White House about the direction of the country and illustrates one of the main rhetorical contrasts between Biden and his former boss, BARACK OBAMA. During his speech Tuesday in Buffalo, N.Y., Biden called the shooting an act of domestic terrorism. He used the term "white supremacy" five times and described the killings as "violence inflicted in the service of hate." To get a sense of how rare these utterances are, look at the eulogy Obama gave for the Rev. CLEMENTA PINCKNEY after he and eight Black parishioners were gunned down in 2015 by a white supremacist at the Mother Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, S.C. The "Amazing Grace" speech is regarded as one of Obama's finest. It was an exhortation to find purpose in horror; a call for grace during unspeakable tragedy. But it did not mention either "white supremacy" or "domestic terrorism." Instead, Obama spoke of the lingering ills of slavery and Jim Crow and the non-linear progress that comes on these frontlines. An Obama aide said there was never an active discussion about whether to define the hatred of the shooter. It was self-evident. Morever, the speech was a eulogy, not a political address, and it was Obama's nature to push redemption over recrimination. Notably, he used the moment to laud Republican leaders for taking down the confederate emblems in their state flags. Of course, things were different then, both for the country and the president. Obama had internalized the political damage that came early in his presidency, when he admonished a white cop for arresting Harvard professor HENRY LOUIS GATES JR. at his own home. His team was acutely aware that the more it engaged on these matters, the sharper the backlash would be. You can see it in the care with which Obama discussed the TRAYVON MARTIN shooting — repeatedly balancing talk of racial inequities in the criminal justice system with lines about the "need" to think "about how do we bolster and reinforce our African American boys." "There has been talk about should we convene a conversation on race," he said at one point. "I haven't seen that be particularly productive." Biden isn't calling for a conversation on race either. He's skipping straight to his conclusions. Part of it is because he doesn't have to deal with the burdens and hurdles of being the first Black president, which — his and Obama's team note — is no small matter. Part of it has to do with coming to office after DONALD TRUMP, when the issues once confined to the far corners of the right have become increasingly formalized in party doctrine or late-night cable script. The march of neo-Nazis in Charlottesville may have compelled Biden to run for president, but the Trump years hardened Obama, too. His response to the 2019 shooting in El Paso included a denunciation of white nationalism. But another part of it, both camps say, is the internal sense that the non-linear progress so thematically integral to Obama's politics has become threatened. In a remarkable historical coincidence, both Obama's Charleston speech and Biden's Buffalo address came in the shadow of generational Supreme Court news. The former was delivered the exact day that same sex marriage was legalized and the latter was offered under the specter of the likely end of Roe v. Wade. "The question was, are we going backwards or are we on the same trajectory? And a constant theme for Obama was that progress never moves in a straight line. There are bursts and there is backlash," said CODY KEENAN, Obama's former chief speechwriter, whose forthcoming book, "Grace: President Obama and Ten Days in the Battle for America ," details the build up to that speech. "In terms of our immediate trajectory in both of these moments, it's hard to argue that backlash isn't winning right now." WEST WING PLAYBOOK GOES ON THE ROAD: Alex is going on Biden's first trip to Asia as president. So over the next several days, West Wing Playbook is going to include several dispatches from the road including a special edition on Sunday afternoon/evening . Anything about the trip we are missing or we should point out? Text/Signal/Wickr Alex at 8183240098. TEXT US — ARE YOU senior policy adviser MARY WALL? We want to hear from you. And we'll keep you anonymous. Or if you think we missed something in today's edition, let us know and we may include it tomorrow. Email us at westwingtips@politico.com.
|
Comments
Post a Comment