METHANE MADNESS: The House Climate Crisis Committee has a second hearing on methane emissions today, focusing on health, job creation and climate change. The committee will hear from advocates and academics on the impact of methane emissions and the benefits of cutting emissions from the oil and gas industry. The committee held a similar hearing last week on the role of state governments in reducing methane emissions featuring the governors of New Mexico and Wyoming. SAVE THE SPECIES: The leadership of the Endangered Species Act Caucus praised the Biden administration's Thursday reversal of Trump-era ESA rules , emphasizing biodiversity's importance in combating climate change. "Healthier wildlife populations mean healthier ecosystems, which results in stronger shorelines, less intense wildfires, better water quality, and fewer pests, among many other benefits," wrote Reps. Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.), Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) and Don Beyer (D-Va.) in a statement. The House passed Dingell's bipartisan Recovering America's Wildlife Act (H.R. 2773 (117)) last week, which would fund state, tribal and territorial endangered species conservation efforts. The Biden administration came out in support of the bill, which also enjoys wide bipartisan support in the Senate. THIS IS ABOUT SEQUOIAS: House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy wants you to stay on topic, thank you very much. During a news conference on a bipartisan bill for interagency cooperation to protect sequoias — the world's biggest tree and important carbon sinks — several reporters were much more interested in asking about the political news of the day, namely former President Donald Trump and the Jan. 6 hearing scheduled to start just a couple of hours later. "If this is going to be something about politics, I've got another press conference you can go to," McCarthy said in response to a question about endorsing Trump in 2024. "This is a stage about sequoias." Nevertheless, the questions persisted, garnering guffaws from the minority leader. "You'll get the same answer," McCarthy said in response to a question about the debunked claims of widespread voter fraud during the 2020 election. "Have you ever visited a sequoia? You wanna take your kids? I will bring you on a tour." McCarthy did eventually answer a question about the Jan. 6 committee, saying he doesn't regret not appointing any members. But he brought the discussion back to trees, saying "I do not want to be the generation that lost it because they were more concerned about something that politically happened a year ago." He closed out the presser congratulating his peers for putting "the health of the giant sequoias ahead of that." A SEED ON CLIMATE: McCarthy acknowledged his bipartisan bill to protect giant sequoias is only a small piece of addressing climate change. But it's unclear if his move to protect a massive tree species threatened by wildfires prevalent in his California district represents the highwater mark of working with Democrats to address climate change should Republicans take over the House. "Our challenge is great when it comes to climate," he said. "Trees are an element that can help us with that. It doesn't solve it all." Rep. Scott Peters of California, the lead Democratic co-sponsor of the sequoia bill, conceded it represents a "one-off." But he added it would spark "a much larger conversation" with Republicans about confronting wildfires made worse by poor forest management practices and worsening drought conditions, as well as on other measures to mitigate fossil fuel emissions. WIND EXECUTIVES RAISE ALARM ON HOUSE PROVISION: Offshore wind industry executives are urging senators to exclude maritime crewing language from the House-passed Coast Guard authorization bill that they warn represents "an existential threat to the future of offshore wind" in the U.S. The provision in question would require crews on specialized offshore international construction vessels match the flag of the vessel or be American mariners as a condition of working on the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf. The language from Republican Garret Graves and Democrat John Garamendi was intended to ensure that U.S. workers are employed in the construction of offshore wind. In a letter Thursday to Senate leaders , the industry argues the House language would result in the delay and potential cancelation of the 19 offshore wind projects with power offtake contracts or awards. There are currently "insufficient" numbers of trained American mariners or crew from the vessel's flag state, which effectively means the provision would block the use of international specialized offshore vessels when there are currently no U.S.-flagged specialized construction vessels to do the work, the executives write.
|
Comments
Post a Comment