ZELENSKYY’S CHAT WITH XI: Chinese President XI JINPING called Ukrainian President VOLODYMYR ZELENSKYY on Wednesday, our own STUART LAU and VERONIKA MELKOZEROVA report. It was a “long and meaningful phone call,” Zelenskyy wrote in a tweet. “I believe that this call, as well as the appointment of Ukraine’s ambassador to China, will give a powerful impetus to the development of our bilateral relations.” Reaction to the call by the Biden administration has been underwhelming. “We’re glad to see that they did talk,” National Security Council spokesperson JOHN KIRBY told reporters. Same on the Hill. "I don't think it makes it a dimes worth a difference around here,” said Rep. MIKE ROGERS (R-Ala.), chair of the House Armed Services Committee. This marks the first time that Xi — who pledged a “no limits” partnership with the Kremin last year and who visited Russian President VLADIMIR PUTIN during the war — has reached out to Kyiv amid Western pressure to do so. The Biden administration has dismissed Beijing’s 12-point peace plan for the conflict, published in February, as empty rhetoric. Beijing’s readout of the call — which included Xi’s offer to dispatch an envoy to Ukraine for “in-depth communication with all parties” — suggests that China is continuing to position itself as a peacemaker, not a war promoter. “A serious policy approach means [China] has to break with Russia,” said DANIEL FRIED, former assistant secretary of State for European and Eurasian affairs now at the Atlantic Council. “A Chinese role in ceasefires? Screw that. That’s Putin’s position and you don’t need China for that –– tell them to take a hike,” Fried said. SUDAN’S STRUGGLE: A second American was killed amidst the growing war in Sudan, National Security Council spokesperson Kirby confirmed Wednesday morning. “We extend our deepest condolences to the family,” he said. Another ceasefire isn’t fully holding, though Kirby told reporters that “we're glad to see that the levels of violence generally appeared to have gone significantly down.” Residents said Wednesday’s fighting was mostly in limited areas of Khartoum and Omdurman, around the military’s headquarters and the Republican Palace, the seat of power, the Associated Press’ SAMY MAGDY reports. The same day, Sudan’s military said the nation’s former autocratic ruler, OMAR BASHIR, was being held in a military-run hospital, the first indication of his location since fighting broke out two weeks ago. His whereabouts were unknown after the prison where he, along with many of his former officials, were being held was attacked. NUKING NORTH KOREA?: A military response to a North Korean nuclear attack would feature American nuclear weapons, South Korean President YOON SUK YEOL seemed to signal on Wednesday, though there was confusion about what he really meant. American officials have long said that Pyongyang launching a nuclear attack would result in the end of the North Korean regime, a line President JOE BIDEN reiterated during a press conference alongside Yoon. But Yoon’s comment seemed explicit, and the first time in memory that the always vague nuclear subtext became text. “President Biden has reaffirmed his ironclad commitment to extended deterrence towards the Republic of Korea,” Yoon said, adding “in the event of North Korea's nuclear attack and promise to respond swiftly, overwhelmingly and decisively using the full force of the alliance, including the United States nuclear weapons.” Some, however, said Yoon either misspoke or, at least, didn’t accurately reflect a change in U.S. policy. “Yoon can’t speak for U.S., and the U.S. wouldn’t endorse it,” said FRANK AUM of the U.S. Institute of Peace. “The U.S. will not guarantee a nuclear response, it’s not a part of the doctrine. Yoon will try to push the envelope as much as possible but U.S. policy and declaratory statements are what matters.” Others agreed, noting that America’s position is that nukes could be used, not will be used. The first day of the state visit has been nuclear weapons forward. Washington has granted Seoul a long-sought place at the table while discussing possible nuclear operations, in exchange for South Korea restating its commitment to not develop its own nuclear arsenal, the Wall Street Journal’s MICHAEL GORDON reports. Under the deal, the U.S. will retain control over the targeting and execution of nuclear operations, U.S. officials said. The text of the agreement — dubbed the “Washington Declaration” — was released Wednesday. Washington will also deploy nuclear-armed submarines to Seoul as a show of support against North Korea’s continued nuclear threats, Biden and Yoon announced. The plan has been in the works for months, with the leaders agreeing that “occasional” and “very clear demonstrations of the strength” of U.S. extended deterrence capabilities need to be an major part of the agreement, senior Biden administration officials told the AP’s AAMER MADHANI, COLLEEN LONG and ZEKE MILLER. Read: Nukes, Ukraine and semiconductors top Biden-Yoon agenda by Phelim SPACE WORRIES: The United States is increasingly examining the space capabilities of itself and adversaries, predicting that while Russia’s program will fail soon, China continues to pose a major threat, the Washington Post’s CHRISTIAN DAVENPORT reported Tuesday. In the next decade, Moscow’s program “very likely will diminish” due to global competition, U.S. sanctions and the prominence of SpaceX, according to leaked Pentagon documents. Beijing, on the other hand, has the ability to “to hold key U.S. and allied space assets at risk” and will probably do so in the case of a Taiwan conflict. ISLAMIC STATE LEADER KILLED: The terrorist leader responsible for planning the attack on Abbey Gate during the evacuation from Kabul airport that killed 13 American service members was killed in a Taliban operation in Afghanistan, our own LARA SELIGMAN reported late Tuesday. Washington had no part in the Taliban raid, which took place in recent weeks, said a senior administration official. The officials interviewed declined to say exactly when the raid occurred, or name the terrorist killed, citing “sensitivities.” IT’S WEDNESDAY: Thanks for tuning in to NatSec Daily. This space is reserved for the top U.S. and foreign officials, the lawmakers, the lobbyists, the experts and the people like you who care about how the natsec sausage gets made. Aim your tips and comments at award@politico.com and mberg@politico.com, and follow us on Twitter at @alexbward and @mattberg33. While you’re at it, follow the rest of POLITICO’s national security team: @nahaltoosi, @PhelimKine, @laraseligman, @connorobrienNH, @paulmcleary, @leehudson, @magmill95, @johnnysaks130, @ErinBanco, @Lawrence_Ukenye, @reporterjoe and @_AriHawkins.
|
Comments
Post a Comment