Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You’ll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day’s biggest stories. G-7 PLEDGE TO RESIST CHINA COERCION: The G-7’s joint actions on supply chains, semiconductors and infrastructure funding are a response “to the three C’s that have upended the world: Covid, conflict and coercion,” U.S. Ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel said at the summit of the world’s leading democracies, held in Hiroshima over the weekend. “There is no going back. This is an inflection point for a new and more relevant G-7.” De-risk, not decouple: President Joe Biden, in a press conference before returning to Washington, chose his words carefully to describe the G-7 stance toward Beijing. “We’re not looking to decouple from China. We’re looking to de-risk and diversify our relationship with China,” Biden said, echoing a term that European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has used to describe the EU’s strategy. “That means taking steps to diversify our supply chains … so we’re not dependent on any one country for necessary product,” Biden said “It means resisting economic coercion together and countering harmful practices that hurt our workers. It means protecting a narrow set of advanced technologies critical for our national security.” More specifically, the leaders agreed in a joint statement to launch the “Coordination Platform on Economic Coercion” with the aim of increasing the group’s “collective assessment, preparedness, deterrence and response to economic coercion” and to further promote cooperation with partners beyond the G-7. They also touched on the issue in the separate G-7 leaders communique, where they directed their trade ministers to explore coordinated action against economic coercion, both within the G-7 and with other countries. Turning to other trade topics, the leaders: — Committed to having a “fully and well-functioning” World Trade Organization dispute settlement system by 2024, reiterating a goal that WTO members made last year. — Called for a plurilateral agreement on e-commerce rules by the end of this year and the permanent extension of a decades-old moratorium on collecting duties on e-commerce transmissions. — Urged WTO members to ratify a new agreement to curb fisheries subsidies so it can enter into force and to finish negotiations on a more comprehensive pact. — Promised continued collaboration to facilitate and promote trade in environmental goods, services and technologies. — Reaffirmed shared concerns with non-market policies and practices that distort global competition, trade and investment. U.S. DEEPENS CRITICAL MINERALS TIES WITH AUSTRALIA: Australia is already one of the world’s major producers of the critical minerals used in electric vehicle batteries and solar panels — raw materials the U.S. will increasingly need in the coming decades. And the EV tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act that Congress passed last year gave the U.S.-Australia relationship a boost (even as it left other allies like Japan and the European Union out in the cold). Now, the U.S. and Australia are forging even stronger ties on clean energy and critical minerals after Biden and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese signed a deal late last week that aims to make it easier for companies to invest and do business in both countries. The Climate, Critical Minerals and Clean Energy Transformation Compact includes commitments to create a bilateral task force on critical minerals, helmed by the National Security Council in the U.S., and to align emissions standards with the goal of forming a more seamless supply chain. Biden also plans to ask Congress to dub Australia a “domestic source” under Title III of the Defense Production Act, which could spur U.S. investment in Australia’s minerals industry. The U.S. is already the largest foreign investor in Australia, though China has become a more active player in its critical minerals sector. Quad squad: Biden and Albanese announced their agreement as Quad leaders gathered for a summit in Japan. The group, which also includes India, launched a network for investors looking to funnel money into critical technologies and announced plans to pursue a memorandum of cooperation that aims to foster trade opportunities through export credit agencies. FORMER BIDEN AIDE QUESTIONS WHITE HOUSE STRATEGY: A lot of trade experts doubt the Biden administration can persuade countries in the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework talks to open their markets to more U.S. exports if the United States does not make similar openings. Now a former Biden House official has added his voice to that choir. “I think what what is hard to do when you're not prepared to put U.S. market access on the table, or other major incentives from the United States, is to get these countries to change their domestic laws to make market access to their markets easier,” Peter Harrell, former senior director for international economics and competitiveness on the White House National Security Council, said at the above-mentioned discussion hosted by WITA. Harrell said he did believe the Biden administration could have “strategic” trade conversations with other countries, even if it is unwilling to negotiate traditional free trade agreements. “But I don't think you're gonna see a lot of foreign market liberalization without the U.S. also putting something on the table,” he said.
|
Comments
Post a Comment