PHARMACARE BILL APPROACHETH — It will be the second landmark legislation the federal Liberals reveal this week where the devil is entirely in the details. This one could fundamentally alter the relationship the Liberals have with the NDP. And maybe it will even change how the NDP gets along with some of its sister provincial parties. The Liberal government is poised to unveil pharmacare legislation worked out with the NDP by end of the week, although there’s still mystery surrounding the exact timing. All eyes are on the Friday deadline set by the NDP, and according to Health Minister MARK HOLLAND, “if you work backwards from March 1st, there's not a lot of geography.” “We're going to meet the timeline,” he told reporters Tuesday. — Tight on messaging: One thing was made clear Tuesday about pharmacare. It’s not what the federal Liberals wanted to spend their day talking about. Tricky, since everyone else is lining up at the mics. — Score so far: First, the NDP ruined some weekends when NDP Leader JAGMEET SINGH scooped the government on news of a deal last week and dished on diabetes and birth control being covered. Then Alberta Health Minister ADRIANA LAGRANGE got out ahead of the government Monday, stating preference for a per-capita share of the program funds and raising ire. Peppered with questions, Holland told reporters “some people are jumping the gun” and reacting prematurely since the government hasn’t unveiled the details yet. “Everybody just needs to take a pause,” he said, noting he had “emphasized” during the negotiations that leaks like these only create confusion. That said, he hasn’t “met a province where they don't want to take action on improving access to drugs and reducing prices.” Finance Minister CHRYSTIA FREELAND sidestepped a reporter’s question on whether the program will affect the budget numbers this year or next. “We have some great announcements that we’ve made this morning. None of them are about pharmacare,” she replied. — Voice of optimism: Former Ontario health minister ERIC HOSKINS, who led a federal advisory council on pharmacare that pitched a single-payer public model in 2019, has provided advice over the past several months to those involved in the negotiating and hammering out the legislation. “It's pretty monumental,” he tells Playbook. “In terms of prescription medicines, it's the biggest advancement in the direction of improving access to prescription medicines since Medicare itself.” Hoskins was among the first to call for extending the January deadline set by the Liberals and NDP, after seeing the “tremendous amount of effort expended by both sides.” Hoskins was careful not to spill any beans, but said he’s not worried about thundering from two provinces — Quebec and Alberta — seeking to opt out already. “I think there'll be momentum, particularly as the first provinces and territories enroll or reach agreement with the federal government.” His report had suggested it be a voluntary, opt-in program. “We reflected on how Medicare evolved in Canada when it was first passed and began to be implemented. I think Saskatchewan was the first province. There were a few at the beginning, but it took five or six years before all provinces and territories actually signed on to Medicare. It didn't happen overnight.” |
Comments
Post a Comment