POLL: AMERICANS LIKE BBB'S HEALTH PROVISIONS BUT WORRY ABOUT COST — Democrats trying to salvage parts of the Biden social spending agenda will find a limited number of issues that resonate with voters heading into the midterm elections, according to a POLITICO-Harvard survey that shows significant concern over whether big-ticket items could lead to more inflation. Respondents think free universal pre-K, paid family and medical leave and lower prescription drug prices would help their families and the country. But only about one in three believe President Joe Biden's entireBuild Back Better Act would help the country, and less than one in four believe it will help their own families, POLITICO's Adriel Bettelheim writes. The numbers: The survey of 1,004 respondents, conducted from Jan. 4 to 9, also found that most are convinced the $1 trillion infrastructure plan Congress passed last year won't help the country or their personal lives. Independents tended to side with Republicans in viewing the package as inflationary, upending the conventional view that big, bipartisan public works initiatives transcend partisan politics. The findings come as Biden continues to rally support for his domestic agenda, like calling in to the Families USA conference Tuesday to renew efforts to pass the package. But respondents to the POLITICO-Harvard survey were skeptical about the benefits when asked about five key items in the package. On social-spending policies, 59 percent said establishing free universal pre-K for the nation's 3- and 4-year-olds would help the country, and 53 percent felt the same about providing four weeks of paid leave for U.S. workers. Just less than half believe that policies in the plan meant to lower prescription drug prices would actually reduce costs. And more than four in 10 people believe that both the BBB and the infrastructure bill will increase inflation. "The public is saying they aren't familiar with the Build Back Better bill and are not supportive of it as it stands," said Robert Blendon, a professor of health policy and political analysis at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, who designed the poll. "But if you rebrand the Build Better Better plan and it only has a few things the public thinks are very important, they could reconsider and might love it." HOYER CONFIDENT A SMALLER BBBCOULD PASS — House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer is still optimistic about Build Back Better's prospects (and the voters' rights bill) but admitted the sweeping social spending package might need to be broken down for passage as Biden suggested last week. "I think we can, and I think we will," rally the party around narrower legislation, Hoyer told POLITICO Playbook co-author Rachael Bade in a livestreamed interview on Tuesday. "We have to look at what we can get, not what we'd like to get." He declined to say which provisions might be shaved off in the Senate, though he said the child tax credit is "very important." Hoyer also argued against inflation concerns, saying that the legislation, combined with measures like the Make It in America Act and the U.S. Innovation and Competition Act, would help people get back to work, thus boosting the economy and counteracting inflation. "When the Republicans say, 'What are you going to do about inflation?' I say, 'We're doing it,'" Hoyer said. He argued supply chain shortages, not federal spending, are the leading cause of inflation. HEART SCREENING GADGETS DON'T HAVE THE BEAT — There's not enough evidence to justify the widespread screening for irregular heartbeat using devices like the Apple Watch, a new review from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force concludes. It's a blow to the legions of gadget makers that have introduced consumer products aimed at detecting the condition: If the task force approved of the devices, insurers would have to cover the services without a co-pay, POLITICO's Darius Tahir writes. "As with any screening test, the question is whether this knowledge can guide management decisions that ultimately improve outcomes. The evidence to date suggests the answer is no," an editorial in JAMA Internal Medicine concludes. The background: Atrial fibrillation is a type of heart rhythm irregularity that can suggest a risk for strokes. Older technology to spot those irregularities was expensive, inconvenient and prescribed by a doctor, limiting its use to at-risk patients. With the advent of consumer products like the Apple Watch, relatively healthy and young patients could get an AF diagnosis — the question is whether that's a meaningful risk for them. What's next: Even with the task force rebuff, the question won't go away, two cardiologists argue in a JAMA editorial. Consumer-available technology will permit AF screening whether clinicians order it or not." |
Comments
Post a Comment