War tomorrow? "We are going to see more rounds of talks. And then it will all go back to the two presidents. Vladimir Putin, he is the decision maker. … I think if Moscow had decided that they will go to war one way or another, they wouldn't invest all that energy in these talks." What are some war effects that are hard to see now? A massive deployment "would be very badly received both by Russian society as well as elites. It would be an enormous domestic stress test for Putin. Then add economic costs, then add a totally upended relationship with the West that would leave Russia so much at the mercy of China, both politically and economically. I don't think Moscow wants that." What does Putin really want here? "He really wants to gain control of Ukraine's future policymaking to make sure that Kiev remains in lockstep with Moscow for years and decades to come. I think that's his very sincere and heartfelt goal; not necessarily very widely shared by people in the Russian elite or society. But even so, for Putin, it is deadly serious. And then the second layer is the European security order: making sure Ukraine will never join Western organizations. Putin probably saw that Ukraine was slipping away from him. Zelenskyy was not delivering. Ukraine is increasingly cooperating with the West, militarily and with NATO countries." Can conflict be avoided? "If the alternative (to war) is concluding some arms control agreements with the United States that would somehow limit the Western military posture around Ukraine, they would need to be reciprocated by Russia, because no one does arms control unilaterally. That, I think, would not be the worst outcome." Does Putin see Biden as weak — after Afghanistan? "I don't think so. I think people in Moscow, at least people who matter and who are influential in foreign policy debates, their thinking was rather that Biden is smart. He's trying to limit his frontlines. He's not fighting each and every battle. Plus, Biden is someone who can speak on behalf of the West. During the whole Trump period, there was no one like that." How deep are Russia's security fears? "Russia, being a sparsely populated and badly governed country, does feel insecure to outside attack, and they have experienced a fair amount of it. Soviet nostalgia: There is some. Putin is not an ethnic nationalist, as he is sometimes portrayed. He's a great power imperialist. … Recently, Russia has been giving up that desire to dominate neighboring countries regardless of what it takes. You can see it is now a case-by-case approach. They have given up on the Baltic states, they view the Baltics as handed over to America. They don't think that the Baltic states have much agency themselves, but they're clearly in the U.S. sphere of influence. They let an ally, Armenia, experience defeat in the hands of Azerbaijan and Turkey." Would finance and energy sanctions work? "Russia has also managed to sanction-proof itself to a great degree. Cutting Russia out of SWIFT (the global payments system) in 2014 would have resulted in total chaos: Russia would not have been able to administer domestic payments, everyone would have gone without their salary. Now that's not the case. … Right now, we happen to need Russian gas much more than we needed earlier. So it's an unfortunate moment for the European Union." (Germany has refused a suggestion to cut Russia out of SWIFT, while the U.S. is in talks with Qatar about boosting gas supplies to Europe in the event of an invasion. If Russia invaded this week, Germany would have to ration its natural gas, because reliable supplies would risk running out before the end of winter.) What about Nord Stream sanctions, specifically? "There is gas going through the Ukrainian pipeline (today), and that inevitably increases the value of the Ukrainian pipeline for Russia, and might reduce the likelihood of (a) big war. I wouldn't recommend relying on that long term, but at the moment, it could have some deterrence value. Nord Stream has very limited deterrence value: Russia wants Nord Stream, too, but it wants Ukraine so much more. There's simply no comparison. And Germany can threaten to cut it (Nord Stream) only until it becomes operational. This is temporary leverage, at best. If within that time window, Russia invades massively, then I think Germany probably will have to cancel Nord Stream, because it's another game changer." What about sanctioning oligarchs? "I don't think that helps at all. Oligarch business is in Russia and depends on good standing with the Kremlin. Sanctions would annoy them a great deal, but it doesn't change the calculus. They wouldn't walk up to President Putin saying, you know, 'Stop it.' Many of them live in Russia anyway. And I guess a good number of them in strategic industries are not encouraged to leave the country. Some don't want to leave because they fear Covid. Some are sanctioned. So they are confined to Russia, by and large, and their earnings are in Russia. Facing the choice between the west and Russia is basically facing the choice between your income and savings. They might be able to take some of their savings to the West and live off them comfortably for the rest of their life, that's true. But their earnings are in Russia and they wouldn't have that any longer. So I do not see that happening." What is most helpful to Ukraine now? "It's not something the West can deliver. But it would really be helpful if Ukraine got its own act together. They have a very strong society, but they have quite weak political elites. The elites can sign agreements, but society can veto them. That was the fate of (the) Minsk Agreements . … That's a sort of systemic problem in Ukraine that makes dealing with the country hard. … Outsiders are discussing Ukraine's fate above the heads of Ukrainians because they are not fit to take part in it. And we have seen it in many Westerners visiting Ukraine recently: They come back completely puzzled because the priority for President Zelenskyy seems to be arresting former President [Petro] Poroshenko as opposed to engaging the West or fending off Russian aggression." RUSSIA — When in doubt, distract: Russia adds Navalny and his top allies to list of terrorists
|
Comments
Post a Comment