Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories. LET'S KEEP TALKING POLITICS: Let's be honest — Anzalone long has been pushing the message that calling for tax hikes on the rich is one of the more popular things Democrats can do. Basically every Democrat in Congress had signaled that they would agree to raise hundreds of billions of dollars in taxes on the rich and corporations, before the party's efforts on the BBB got waylaid. (In fact, Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona was the only Democrat to take issue with raising the corporate rate and top rate on individuals.) But it's fair to note that Democrats aren't universally sure that embracing tax hikes is a political winner. Just take a look at the two tax chairs: Senate Finance Chair Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) is all in on that idea, while House Ways and Means Chair Richard Neal(D-Mass.) — who pushed a measure with big tax hikes through his committee — speaks more cautiously on the issue. For their part, Republicans don't seem particularly threatened about Democrats going on the offensive on taxes, even if some will say they're not surprised that forcing the rich and corporations polls well. (Some in the GOP also believe Democrats leaning in on taxes could help them with higher-income suburban voters who defected when Trump was president, among other things). There are also these questions to consider, given that historical forces are working against Democrats in the upcoming midterms — in addition to some downright middling approval ratings for Biden. How much would a tax-the-rich message move the needle for Democrats, with Republicans likely focusing on inflation, crime and other issues in the campaign? And could this particular argument fall flat for Democrats, if they fall short on significantly raising taxes on the rich and corporations through some offshoot of the BBB that meets Sen. Joe Manchin 's approval? "It's always better to do something than to prescribe it," Anzalone acknowledged. "But if it doesn't get done, it's still disproportionately because Republicans weren't willing to join Democrats. We'd still have a good argument on what's stopping it." LET'S TALK IRS: Here's something that might get some attention — remember that backlog at the IRS that numbered in the millions of pieces of paper? The problem is actually bigger than we all thought, The Washington Post reported — the tax collector still hasn't processed close to 24 million returns from last year. And it doesn't look like it'll be getting better anytime soon, given the IRS's problems replenishing its employee ranks. Based on this response from Neal, this newest revelation also could prompt a new debate about IRS funding — a hot topic for a good decade now. "The IRS needs greater support to carry out its most essential functions, like processing tax returns, enforcing the tax code, and closing the tax gap," Neal said after accusing the GOP of having "starved the IRS of funding." More IRS: There's a good reason that you frequently hear that the tax collector has a lot on its plate. Take this, from our Sam Sabin, in discussing the federal government's battle against cybercrimes: "The IRS' ability to trace dark money has made it a crucial partner to other federal agencies investigating ransomware gangs — a role it played last summer by helping the FBI seize millions of dollars in bitcoin from the hackers who had crippled the U.S. gasoline supply." Semi-related note: "Spouses, taxes and crypto: The unanswered questions for Congress' stock trading ban," via our Katy O'Donnell.
|
Comments
Post a Comment