THE COMPETITION CONFERENCE: The House and Senate are slated to go head to head on their competing versions of innovation and competitiveness legislation, with House progressives insisting on priorities likely to be nonstarters with senators who negotiated a more bipartisan package. The House passed its version, the America COMPETES Act, on Friday, with only one Republican, Rep. Adam Kinzinger , voting in favor and after weeks of prodding from the White House to get on with it to secure an economic legislative win. The House version includes a harder line on trade protections to shield U.S. manufacturing from foreign competition. But that course is likely to receive a frostier welcome in the upper chamber. "This bill is going to arrive in the Senate DOA, and because it is so chock full of progressive, protectionist policies that will never make it through the Senate," Rep. Stephanie Murphy (D-Fla.) told POLITICO. But making too many concessions toward Senate centrists risks losing progressive support in the House, and vulnerable Democrats don't want yet another bill to stall or sink as midterms approach. The House passed bill also includes provisions to expand renewable energy development, including an amendment to authorize offshore wind lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico and around the Southeast and provisions directing the Energy Secretary to create a reserve of backup transformers and promote domestic grid equipment manufacturing. It would also authorize a DOE grant and loan program to encourage domestic solar manufacturing. Pro's Gavin Bade and Sarah Ferris have more. COMING UP IN COMMITTEE: The Senate Energy Committee has several hearings on its agenda this week. The full panel will meet Tuesday to go over three nominations at DOE and DOI, including Laura Daniel-Davis, nominee to be Interior's assistant secretary for land and minerals management. Daniel-Davis will be facing a rare double-questioning from the committee after having already had a confirmation hearing last year. Last week's scheduled hearing was bumped due to a conflict with a classified Senate briefing, according to a committee aide. The committee's National Parks subpanel will meet Wednesday to go over the implementation of the Great American Outdoors Act, and the full committee will meet again Thursday to discuss opportunities for clean hydrogen use. In the water space, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Water Resources and Environment Subcommittee is meeting Tuesday to set the stage for renewing the Water Resources Development Act. The subpanel will hear from local stakeholders on proposals to go into a revamped WRDA for this year. The House Oversight Hearing Committee will convene climate experts and advocates to discuss the merits of oil majors' climate pledges. Several board members on some of the nation's largest oil companies declined invitations to testify at a committee hearing Tuesday, prompting the committee to give them a Monday deadline to voluntarily commit to attend a March 8 hearing. The House Natural Resources Committeewill also have a hearing Tuesday on social justice in environmental policy making, particularly the role of environmental groups and grantmaking foundations. Finally, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee will have a legislative hearing Wednesday on the American Nuclear Infrastructure Act, S. 2373 (117), and the STRANDED Act, S. 1290 (117), which would assist with community nuclear waste management. WOTUS ON NOTICE: All 50 Senate Republicans are urging EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers not to update its definition of waters protected under the Clean Water Act until the Supreme Court finishes considering a long-running court battle in Sackett vs. EPA, which examines lower court implementations of WOTUS standards. EPA was hoping the Supreme Court would not take on the case until it had completed its own WOTUS definitions, but Senate Republicans are now saying the administration should take a pause. "Proceeding with the rulemaking at this time, despite the pending litigation and potentially influential ruling, will only deepen uncertainty within the regulated community," the lawmakers wrote in a letter to Regan and Michael Connor, assistant secretary of the Army for Civil Works. The lawmakers also protested the administration's proposed rule changes as a "land grab that arguably surpasses its 2015 predecessor." They asked the administration to suspend the WOTUS rulemaking or at least extend the public comment period until at least 60 days after the high court decides the EPA case. Read the letter here.
|
Comments
Post a Comment