Happy Friday, rulers! Before we get to the newsletter, we have a request again this week. In 2018, California enacted a law requiring at least one woman on the board of every company based in the state. Did this law affect you? If yes, let us know. We want to hear from readers who have had personal experiences with the law and how it changed business and women's careers in the state. Fill out the form here. Thanks to Maya Partharasarathy for helping to put together this newsletter. For all the progress the #MeToo movement has made to combat workplace harassment — just this week Congress passed a bill to address the problem — the story of Eric Lander reveals the persistence of another common office behavior: bullying. Until this week, Lander was President Joe Biden's lead scientist, heading the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, including the president's "Cancer Moonshot" initiative. His fall from grace came after a White House investigation found he had exhibited demeaning, abrasive and "bullying" behavior. At first, Lander stayed on the job — in spite of Biden's vow to fire office jerks — until POLITICO published a report about Lander's actions, including allegations from staffers that he targeted women in particular. Lander didn't comment for POLITICO's story, but in his resignation letter, he wrote, "I am devastated that I caused hurt to past and present colleagues by the way in which I have spoken to them." This week, we called seven workplace consultants and other experts to get their thoughts on how workplace bullies still get away with their behavior in the post-#MeToo era and whether that's starting to change. Bullying simply refers to behavior that is unkind, disrespectful and demeaning. It is not the same as sexual harassment, a legal term that refers to conduct targeting people based on protected categories such as race, age or sexual orientation. "It's a higher bar," Alexis Ronickher, an attorney who handles employment cases for Katz, Marshall & Banks in Washington, said of harassment. Bullies may be indiscriminate in their behavior, but they usually zero in on people with less seniority — which often means women and minorities, according to the consultants we talked to. In Lander's case, the advocacy group 500 Women Scientists had publicly questioned his potential appointment in a January 2021 column in Scientific American, citing his "controversial" reputation among scientists. "You see it in the sciences all the time, but it happens in other industries, too. Women are ignored," Emily Pinckney, who heads 500 Women Scientists, told Women Rule this week. "We're dealing with everyday microaggressions working in laboratories. Women don't get awards, and we don't get credit for research we do." Deborah Tuerkheimer, author of "Credible: Why We Doubt Accusers and Protect Abusers," said it's still all too common for those kinds of complaints not to be heeded. "When someone comes forward against a powerful man, that's threatening to the status quo. So those statements are unlikely to be seen as credible," she said. "It's about credibility as power." It's also not uncommon, across different industries, for harassment and bullying to be tolerated until it gets public attention, said Sharmili Majmudar, who oversees policy at the Chicago-based advocacy organization Women Employed. Bullies are "given multiple chances. And it's only when it hits the headlines that there's accountability for that behavior," she said. In other words, the behavior might be tolerated until it begins to "undermine the company," as Northwestern University professor Kimberly Yuracko put it. To date, addressing the problem often has meant sending the bully to counseling, which Majmudar said is sometimes seen as a cover for employers and does little to help victims. Only more recently have companies begun to offer help to victims who might experience depression, anxiety, PTSD or even physical pain, the consultants told Women Rule. Discussions about bullying in the workplace also have expanded as educators have broached the topic in schools. Even former first lady Melania Trump called attention to the issue. The good news is several of the women we spoke to said the ground is beginning to shift to put an end to the "Mad Men" stereotypes that still allow bad behavior if you're a rainmaker, top sales guy — or brilliant scientist. Younger employees want fairness. Just look at the Instagram page from Hill staffers that's also drawing attention this week. They're fuming over how they're being treated in the workplace, whether it's low pay or dehumanizing behavior. "Newer people in the workforce are putting up with less," Ronickher said. "There's a feeling of 'I should not have to live with that.'" They're also "less willing to make compromises just to get by," added Emily Martin, vice president for education and workplace justice at the Law Center in Washington. "They're more idealistic about what we should expect at work, and that's helpful for workers of all ages." Another reason for the shift in attitudes: the recognition that bullies harm the bottom line. In the words of Judith DeVries, director of learning at Challenger, Gray & Christmas consultant company: "We waste a lot of good talent — a lot of good female talent — because you shut down when you've been bullied." Still, bullying behavior isn't going to disappear because "lower-level forms of workplace misconduct aren't legally actionable," said Yuracko, the Northwestern professor. Individual companies are trying to draft bullying policies, but doing it across industries would be difficult. |
Comments
Post a Comment