Happy Friday, rulers! Did you watch the 24-hour job interview on live TV this week? It was something. Special thanks to Maya Parthasarathy for helping to put together this newsletter. There were plenty of cringe-worthy questions posed this week to federal judge Ketanji Brown Jackson during her Supreme Court nomination confirmation hearings. Discussions about her upbringing and how she juggles work and parenthood are part of the familiar territory that women must navigate — issues that generally don't come up with men. But it was the persistent interrupting by Sens. Lindsey Graham and Ted Cruz that was most uncomfortable to watch. The two Republicans peppered Jackson with questions and talked over her as she tried to respond. "It's not a new phenomenon but seeing it on this stage when we're talking about a Supreme Court justice really emphasizes the insidiousness of that behavior," Sharmili Majmudar, executive VP of policy at Women Employed, a nonprofit advocacy group in Chicago, told Women Rule. You couldn't help but be reminded of the 2020 vice presidential debate, when Kamala Harris, another accomplished Black woman, had to say "Mr. Vice President, I'm speaking. If you don't mind letting me finish, then we can have a conversation." Jackson is in a different position than Harris was that night. Jackson isn't competing with the senators, only responding as part of her job interview. She held her tongue and kept her patience, which also is familiar territory for women. "Women being interrupted by men in the workplace has been an ongoing area of conflict and an area that is a behavioral representation of workplaces that have difficulty truly including women or other groups that are under-represented or lack power in the hierarchy," says Majmudar. "In many ways it's a power play. It's about what status do you see yourself as versus the person you're interrupting. In some cases, it's conscious and in other cases its unconscious bias being reinforced through this behavior of interruption." She pointed all the way back to a UC Santa Barbara study from the 1970s, which found that men were responsible for 47 of the 48 interruptions during conversations analyzed for that study. More recent research shows Jackson's experience during the nomination hearings could be a prelude to what she would experience on the high court. A study conducted at Northwestern University law school revealed female justices of the Supreme Court are three times more likely to be interrupted by men during oral arguments than male justices. And a 2019 study of gender dynamics in Congress shows women are more likely than men to be interrupted during committee work, especially Senate committees. "We see a similar pattern for rapid-fire 'interruption clusters,' an aggressive form of interruption," the authors wrote. They're microaggressions experienced by women across the political and corporate spectrum, and especially by women of color. Congresswoman Robin Kelly, who's served in Congress a decade and is vice chair of the Energy & Commerce Committee and sits on the Committee on Oversight and Reform, says she's been in plenty of meetings over the years where she's been "interrupted, talked over or said something that isn't heard until a man says it later." For the most part she feels it's not always intentional and she recognizes it has a lot to do with "how you were raised." She says "sometimes when someone's rude, it doesn't necessarily have to do with me being female." Still, she adds, the confrontations seen during the Supreme Court hearings might not happen if "there were more of us [women] in the room, more of us at the table, and more at the head table. That's how things change." Anita Shelton, who heads DC Women in Politics, a bipartisan group that works to elect women candidates up and down the ticket, sees the interruptions Jackson sat through as just one part of the inherent racial bias that was part of the hearings. "We wouldn't expect anything more from some of them. And others just don't realize that their comments are openly disparaging and with a racial bent," Shelton says, pointing to questions about Jackson's upbringing and comments that her parents must be proud. "That's all nice but it's a disparity. They seem surprised that we would have an African American woman who has a typical family." It's about Jackson making sure senators feel comfortable with her, Rhonda Briggins, co-founder of Vote Run Lead, says of the high court nominee talking about her upbringing and raising children. "Men are never required to do that. Men have not had to talk about family life in that way. When women work, people want to ask, 'Where are your children?' So in order to not have that line of questioning, we put it out there before people bring it up."
|
Comments
Post a Comment