THIS BUD'S ON PUTIN: The King of Beers has a plan to make its cans more sustainable. But an aluminum manufacturer that was going to produce its low-carbon cans is in Russia — so that's a problem, as E&E News' Jael Holzman and Corbin Hiar report. En+ Group is one of the world's largest producers of low-carbon aluminum. The company uses hydropower and a pioneering aluminum extraction method to make its manufacturing process nearly emissions-free. That's what led Budweiser's UK and Ireland arm to announce a deal with En+ in September to produce 5 million "ultra-low carbon" cans. It touted the agreement in December as part of its push to achieve net-zero carbon emissions across its operations by 2040. Budweiser is now distancing itself from En+, less than six months after announcing the collaboration. The "pilot project to produce the low-carbon can has concluded and we have no ongoing contract with En+/Rusal," Budweiser parent Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV spokesperson Ana Zenatti said in an email, adding that the company was "focused on supporting our Ukrainian colleagues and the humanitarian efforts for those affected." The war could hamstring Russia's low-carbon industries and any companies looking to do business with them. Ball Corp., a can-making company that inked a similar deal with En+ last year, didn't respond to a request for comment on the status of that partnership. "[Russia] is such an important part of the green supply chain in aluminum, and I don't see a way out of that conundrum," said Uday Patel , a principal analyst at Wood Mackenzie. If the turmoil surrounding Russian resources is unresolved by "the middle of this year," Patel said, "there is the potential for a reversal of trying to lower carbon in our consumer products." PUT UP OR SHUT UP: Russia's invasion of Ukraine poses a textbook ESG question for all companies, according to Russia expert Fiona Hill, in case you missed Maura Reynolds' sobering, grounding interview with her earlier this week. "Ordinary companies should make a decision. This is the epitome of "ESG" that companies are saying is their priority right now — upholding standards of good Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance," Hill said. "Just like people didn't want their money invested in South Africa during apartheid, do you really want to have your money invested in Russia during Russia's brutal invasion and subjugation and carving up of Ukraine?" IMPORT BAN COLLECTING STEAM: Politicians are showing increasing appetite to cut off Russian oil imports despite the risk of raising energy prices further during the runup to midterm elections, Josh Siegel reports. Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) introduced a bill Thursday with 16 other sponsors to block imports of Russian oil and said they would take the blame for a jump in gasoline prices that would likely follow. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is also on board. The White House still is not, with press secretary Jen Psaki saying Thursday "we don't have a strategic interest in reducing the global supply of energy, and that would raise prices at the gas pump for the American people."
|
Comments
Post a Comment