Welcome to POLITICO's West Wing Playbook, your guide to the people and power centers in the Biden administration. With help from Allie Bice. Send tips | Subscribe here | Email Alex | Email Max When JOE BIDEN ran for president, his campaign team complained to anyone who would listen about what they perceived to be unfair coverage in The New York Times. But these days, the president and his team are striking a different tone about America's most prominent newspaper. That's largely thanks to the work of one reporter. Over the past month, the White House's press shop has repeatedly promoted stories from The New York Times' fact-checker, LINDA QIU. Biden cited a Qiu piece himself earlier this month when he addressed House Democrats in Philadelphia. "Headline fact checker in the New York Times: "Republicans Wrongly Blame Biden for Rising Gas Prices," he said, reading the headline of the piece. "And it goes on to explain why gas prices are so high." Many members of the president's press team have also become Qiu content boosters in recent weeks. On March 10, deputy press secretary ANDREW BATES tweeted out the same Qiu fact check on why "Republicans Wrongly Blame Biden for Rising Gas Prices," adding a touch of his own commentary. "The only way to be straight with readers is to include this context," Bates noted. Press secretary JEN PSAKI shared the same piece, noting "FACT CHECK on GOP." On Monday, Bates shared another story by Qiu. "@nytimes Fact Check: 'Attacks on Judge Jackson's Record on Child Sexual Abuse Cases Are Misleading' Hawley and Blackburn 'have taken the judge's remarks and sentencing decisions out of context, distorting her record,'" he tweeted. Fact-checkers are tools of extreme convenience for politicians and their teams—there to boost when they affirm your case and ignore into mere non-existence when they cut you down. Not all of Qiu's fact checks have been heralded by the White House. "Biden's Inaccurate Claims in Defending Afghanistan Withdrawal," went one headline from last August with the subheadline: "The president made misleading or false claims about the reaction of allies to the withdrawal, the presence of Al Qaeda and conditions for Americans traveling to the Kabul airport." But there have been recent ones that have boosted the administration and pushed back against misleading or murky stories. "Theory About U.S.-Funded Bioweapons Labs in Ukraine Is Unfounded," went one. "Explaining the Claim That the Biden Administration Is Funding 'Crack Pipes,'" went another. The New York Times did not respond to a request for comment. Qiu, who joined the Times in 2017 after working at PolitiFact, is part of a new generation of journalists specializing in fact-checking—a journalism sub-genre that other reporters bemoan because it at times presumes that they aren't actually checking facts in their own copy. In response to the explosion of false information online and former President DONALD TRUMP's habit of not telling the truth ( "truthful hyperbole," he once called it), numerous major news organizations beefed up on fact-checkers. The Washington Post even maintained an "untruth tracker for the ages" that reported Trump made 30,573 false or misleading claims as president. CNN's DANIEL DALE became a household name among liberal political junkies with his fact checks of the past president and accumulated 1.2 million Twitter followers in the process. But many prominent fact checkers employed by the major outlets have also been heavily criticized—especially among conservatives—for how they select the topics they check. And it has lost steam during the Biden presidency. Biden does not exaggerate or mislead as often as Trump did, but the appetite and audience for Biden fact checks also seems to have abated. As a result, outlets aren't fact-checking Biden as aggressively as they did Trump. Dale largely has kept his fact-checking focus on Republicans, with his latest Biden fact-check story for CNN's online publication coming in January. The Washington Post, which still publishes fact checks, only kept a running tally for Biden's first 100 days, finding 78 false or misleading statements (511 such statements in Trump's first 100 days). "Here's the Biden database -- which we do not plan to extend beyond 100 days," The Post's GLENN KESSLER tweeted at the time. "I have learned my lesson." TEXT US — Are you KRISTEN ALLEN, the new press secretary in KAMALA HARRIS' office? We want to hear from you (we'll keep you anonymous). Or if you think we missed something in today's edition, let us know and we may include it tomorrow. Email us at westwingtips@politico.com or you can text/Signal/Wickr/WhatsApp Alex at 8183240098 or Max at 7143455427.
|
Comments
Post a Comment