UNDER THE MICROSCOPE — The House of Commons ethics committee met for four and a half hours on Monday to study the RCMP's use of spyware to hack mobile devices, and will meet for another four hours today.
The study was prompted by POLITICO's revelation in June that the police force had admitted to using spyware for covert surveillance. The RCMP has the ability to intercept text messages, emails, photos, videos, financial records and other data from cell phones and laptops, and to remotely turn on a device's camera and microphone. In case you (somehow) weren't glued to the live feed, we bring you the top five things we learned, the top three questions that went unanswered, and a look at what to expect from today's testimony. What we learned: — The numbers: The RCMP says it has used spyware in 32 investigations since 2017, and has targeted 49 devices. But MARK FLYNN , the RCMP's assistant commissioner for national security and protective policing, told the committee the police force has used similar technology since 2002. — Pegasus out: The RCMP says it has never used controversial Pegasus spyware from Israeli firm NSO Group, which has been used to hack smartphones belonging to journalists and human rights activists. Public Safety Minister MARCO MENDICINO said he'd be willing to consider banning Pegasus spyware in Canada. — A warning: Flynn told parliamentarians he has "very little doubt" foreign states are targeting them using spyware. — Ramping up: The RCMP has used spyware with increasing frequency over the last five years. In 2017, just two investigations used the invasive technology. So far this year, that number has increased to nine. — Privacy watchdog in the dark: The RCMP has yet to provide any information to Privacy Commissioner Philippe Dufresne about its use of spyware, though he will receive a briefing on Aug. 23. Dufresne wants the government to update the Privacy Act to require all government institutions to prepare impact assessments before launching programs that could affect people's privacy. What we didn't learn: — Who are the providers? The RCMP won't give the names of the spyware tools it's using, saying criminals could use that information "to render the tools ineffective." — Which investigations use spyware? The police force also refused to provide a list of the warrants it has obtained to use spyware, as the committee had requested. Committee chair and Conservative MP PAT KELLY called the "blanket refusal" troubling. — Who else? Mendicino wouldn't say whether other agencies, including CSIS and the CSE, also use spyware. Read POLITICO's full coverage of Monday's committee meetings. What to expect today: — First up at the ethics committee is former privacy commissioner DANIEL THERRIEN, who has already sparred with the RCMP over its use of invasive technology. Last year, Therrien ruled the RCMP had broken the law by using facial recognition software from Clearview AI. He also found there were "serious and systemic gaps in the RCMP's policies and systems to track, identify, assess and control novel collections of personal information through new technologies." — In the afternoon, the committee will hear from RONALD DIEBERT , director of the University of Toronto's Citizen Lab, who will make the argument that "Pegasus-like spyware is to surveillance as nuclear technology is to weapons." Diebert will recommend that the federal government should hold public consultations and develop a legal framework for the use of spyware. He will also recommend that Canadian agencies not be allowed to purchase spyware from companies connected to human rights abuses abroad, and that procurement of spyware by government agencies be made public. |
Comments
Post a Comment