BACK TO THE BOOK TAX: Here's the thing — pass-through advocates like the National Federation of Independent Business and other groups have long backed the GOP, and they've been working hard to keep any expansion or extension of the current loss limits out of the Democrats' budget reconciliation measure. NFIB and dozens of other groups, including the National Association of Manufacturers and the S Corporation Association, wrote to congressional leaders last month — urging them not to rely on loss limits or an expansion of Obamacare's net investment income tax to help pay for any new fiscal package. Those revenue-raisers, the groups wrote, would be " shouldered entirely on the backs of small, individually, and family-owned businesses." As we noted above, both parties have used loss limits to help pay for their priorities in budget reconciliation measures over the last five years. But until deep into Sunday, it looked like neither of those two tax changes would make it into the Democrats' reconciliation package — until Democrats needed to find a new revenue source, and fast, to replace the money lost from the private equity changes in the book tax. Pass-through advocates said the loss limits were put into the bill so quickly on Sunday that they didn't get much of a chance to mobilize, and wondered whether GOP lawmakers would have made the private equity push if they knew the end result would be an extension of the loss limits. If nothing else, some Republicans seemed to acknowledge that their work to poke holes in the book tax might not have totally worked out. "Democrats almost fixed it, but then they made it worse by replacing it with a tax on small business," the House Ways and Means Republicans tweeted about the Sunday afternoon debate. SO NOW WHAT? The House is scheduled to take up the Senate's fiscal package late this week. So is there any chance the bill runs into trouble on the other side of the Capitol, where Democrats only have a four-vote cushion at the moment? In short, it doesn't look likely. There has been some talk about whether more centrist House Democrats would be very keen on voting for tax increases, especially this close to the election. But the truth is that every House Democrat except for one voted for the broader Build Back Better legislation last November, so it's not clear how much political gain there would be from voting no now. And in any event, most House Democrats have been largely positive about the Senate's efforts, even those blue state lawmakers who have for months said they couldn't back any big tax measure that didn't offer relief to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act's $10,000 cap on state and local deductions. Plus, it's hard to imagine Nancy Pelosi letting this vote fail, particularly if it could basically be her swan song as speaker. Some further reading to catch up from over the weekend: "Wireless industry scores tax win in Democrats' final reconciliation package," via Pro Tech's John Hendel. Plus: " Democrats go with 'the least bad' tax ," from Pro Tax's Brian Faler. And from the energy side: " Washington bureaucracy could rescue Democrats from their EV tax credit problem," via our Tanya Snyder and Alex Daugherty. Also: The New York Post caught some hot mic sniping between Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and his Democratic colleagues over the child tax credit.
|
Comments
Post a Comment