DISPATCH FROM THE WOKE WAR FRONT — High on a Supreme Court win against the Environmental Protection Agency, West Virginia is taking aim at a new federal foe: The Securities and Exchange Commission. West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey has signaled that he plans to mount a legal challenge to a proposed SEC rule that would regulate investment funds marketed as socially or environmentally responsible. In a comment letter filed with the SEC this week, Morrisey and 20 other Republican state attorneys general said the securities regulator is trying to make itself "the regulator of broader social ills." The proposed rule, they said, also runs afoul of their winning case at the high court, West Virginia v. EPA, which curbed federal authority to regulate carbon emissions from power plants. "The woke left is going full throttle in their mission to change every facet of American life," Morrisey said, "and erode our democratic institutions to suit their liberal agenda." At issue is an SEC labeling proposal that would require investment funds that purport to be green or socially aware to live up to those claims. While the rule can't be challenged in court until it's finalized, the letter from Morrisey and other conservative AGs provides an early look at the claims opponents are likely to raise. SEC's proposed rule would add "onerous reporting requirements for investment funds with no rational justification," Morrisey wrote. Here's who signed the letter: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Wyoming, and West Virginia. Here's the most interesting part: The proposed rule would have an "unjustifiably negative effect on certain industries," the AGs wrote, noting that ESG labeling intends to "highlight for investors the extent to which a fund's portfolio is exposed to portfolio companies with higher carbon intensity." That means, the attorneys general wrote, "industries such as mining or power generation are likely to receive less investing." Well, maybe. "This rule would make these funds explain what they consider ESG to mean and to explain how the fund is consistent with ESG," said Todd Phillips, director of financial regulation and corporate governance at the Center for American Progress. "That is a good thing so that investors can look at a fund and know what it means and that they're not being lied to." There's a lot more to this story. Lesley Clark at POLITICO's E&E News has the rundown.
|
Comments
Post a Comment