SALMONELLA RULEMAKING INCOMING: The Agriculture Department's food safety arm is proposing ratcheting up efforts to contain consumer infections from salmonella in food, Marcia reports . The Food Safety and Inspection Service is not yet at the rulemaking stage, but Deputy Undersecretary Sandra Eskin said that FSIS could start proposing rules as early as mid-2023. Proposed framework: FSIS released a proposed framework. It would consist of the following: — Require testing for salmonella before animals enter any processing facility and incentivize companies to monitor for salmonella throughout their supply chains. — Improving testing and tracing processes for salmonella at multiple points during poultry processing. — Create an "enforceable" standard for salmonella strains by requiring recalls of products that test positive for specific strains or by requiring contamination below certain levels. As part of the effort, FSIS will conduct additional scientific studies and data to better understand salmonella in poultry products and prevent its spread. FSIS target: Government data shows that in more than a fifth of salmonella infections poultry products are the leading source of salmonella infections. Most people who become infected with salmonella, a bacteria, recover within a few days , but some can develop severe disease with lasting effects. FSIS says that it failed to reduce salmonella levels to target levels between 2010 and 2020 and is taking additional steps to reach its 2030 target of "no more than 11.5 per 100,000 consumers per year." Poultry is just one source of salmonella; it can also be found in other livestock as well as fruits and vegetables. To meet its target, FSIS must reduce overall salmonella infections 25 percent. Chicken industry blowback: The National Chicken Council said that while it is sympathetic to reducing salmonella infections, that the new proposed framework lacks scientific rigor, pointing to USDA data that 90 percent of chicken tested negative for salmonella from July 2021 to June 2022. They also blamed consumer use, like improper cooking and handling, for infections. Eskin pushed back, saying "the people within the agency include epidemiologists and microbiologists and veterinarians. So I would invite critics who say we don't have science, that we don't have data. Bring it on." What's next: The agency will host a public meeting Nov. 3 on the proposed regulatory framework and is soliciting public feedback.
|
Comments
Post a Comment