IT'S SO CLOSE: Election Day is now tomorrow — which means we will be able to speak with some more clarity pretty soon about the future of domestic tax policy. That's true in the short-term, with Republicans heavily favored to win the House on Tuesday and having a very strong chance to take back the Senate, too. As plenty of observers have noted, the midterm results likely will influence how ambitious the two parties are in the upcoming lame-duck session. That will in turn help decide both whether Congress passes yet another year-end tax bill, and how sweeping it might be. (For whatever it's worth, the expectation — or at least fervent hope — for many tax people is that some tax-related measures will pass before 2023.) But there are also longer-term questions to consider, too — like how tax policy might look in the next Congress, particularly if Republicans have full control of Congress. The GOP having both chambers would allow them to try to craft a budget reconciliation bill that could potentially seek to fully extend the individual tax cuts in the Republicans' 2017 tax law, which don't actually expire until the end of 2025. Republicans could also try to pass bills extending the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act as more of a messaging exercise ahead of 2025, outside of budget reconciliation. But the end result is probably the same: With President Joe Biden still in the Oval Office, getting a full TCJA extension into law is a heavy lift. And then one more thing to watch out for: As you might recall from 2011, Republicans might only need an aggressive House majority to use the debt limit to force policy concessions out of Democrats. So it's worth noting how Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.), perhaps the most insurgent of the candidates seeking to become the next top Republican at House Ways and Means, brought up that new $80 billion in IRS funding when discussing potential priorities for next year. Smith told Reuters in a statement that the GOP would " use every legislative opportunity – including the debt ceiling" — to, among other things, "repeal the 87,000 new IRS agents Democrats are hiring to target American families." (One more time: That 87,000 new agents figure falls far short of telling the whole story.) MORE ON EVERYTHING IN A BIT, but first thanks for coming to the "hello darkness, my old friend" version of Weekly Tax. Speaking of the light — that's just how barbecue looks , everybody. I mean, what's so funny? Today marks 57 years since the birth of a 20th century advertising hall of famer — the Pillsbury Doughboy. It would tickle us pink if you sent your best scoops. Email: bbecker@politico.com , bfaler@politico.com , bguggenheim@politico.com and teckert@politico.com . You can also reach us on Twitter at @berniebecker3 , @tobyeckert , @brian_faler , @ben_guggenheim , @POLITICOPro and @Morning_Tax . Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro . You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories.
|
Comments
Post a Comment