CRUNCH TIME: The National Labor Relations Board needs money, badly. Or at least that's the pitch that's been coming from the agency's political appointees and its union representatives for well over a year now. Its annual budget has sat at a little over $274.2 million since 2014. The thought from organized labor and union-friendly Democratic allies was that unified control of Congress would be enough to effectuate a substantial boost to the NLRB's funding levels — especially as union's popularity has soared and the agency has seen its workload balloon . However to date that has not materialized, and the prospect of Republicans grasping power in Congress (still a possibility, at least in the House) all but shuts that window of opportunity for at least two years. "We have a huge target on our backs," Michael Bilik, an NLRB attorney and legislative co-chair for the National Labor Relations Board Union, told POLITICO. "It's been a top priority of Republicans to prevent us from getting a single dollar of an increase." Against that backdrop, the NLRBU is making a late push for lawmakers to hammer out a spending deal in the lame-duck term — and sounding alarm over dire consequences if one doesn't materialize. "Clearly the best chance we're gonna have in the next two years is during the lame duck session, Bilik said. Last week the NLRBU posted a Twitter thread raising the prospect of furloughing employees in the not-to-distant future, due to the crunch of rising costs — plus President Joe Biden's 4.6 percent raise for much of the federal workforce — into a flat budget. Headcount at the NLRB has shrunk by hundreds, down to about 1,200 since its last budget increase. "At no other time in recent memory has the need for a robust and fully funded NLRB been greater," Bill Samuel, the AFL-CIO's director of government affairs, said in a statement. "This isn't the time for furloughs. This is the time for funding." Of course the dynamics that have stymied budget increases in the past remain the same. Conservatives and business groups are hard-set against bolstering the NLRB, while for Democrats, there's always a laundry list of priorities competing for what funding is available. Plus the money at stake — roughly $45 million — is minuscule relative to other items hashed out in spending negotiations, making it a tough sell to hold up an agreement over. The NLRB did not return a request for comment. GOOD MORNING. It's Monday, Nov. 14. Welcome back to Weekly Shift, your go-to tipsheet on employment and related immigration news. As receivers of many a random PR pitch, we found this stunt pretty engrossing . Send feedback, tips, and exclusives to emueller@politico.com and nniedzwiadek@politico.com . Follow us on Twitter at @eleanor_mueller and @nickniedz .
|
Comments
Post a Comment