First in MT: A group of business and tourism leaders is asking Congress to bolster preclearance operations at Toronto Pearson International Airport to decrease wait times for U.S. travelers. The Canadian airport screens millions of U.S. travelers every year, but the Global Business Travel Association and tourism leaders in Las Vegas and Salt Lake City say that average wait times for CBP screenings are nearly 60 minutes and reached 90 minutes on peak days last summer. Holiday concerns: In the letters, the organizations requested federal funds to support regular security preclearance operations, and ensure that Toronto Pearson has sufficient temporary officers and overtime funding to support travel this holiday season. "These delays in processing passengers and shorter hours of operations are causing U.S.-bound passengers to be stuck in preclearance and subsequently risk being left behind," GBTA wrote in its letter. "Beyond that, CBP's limited capacity has resulted in a capacity cap at Toronto Pearson which artificially limits U.S.-bound flights. As champions of travel, we take significant issue with this." PAY UP: The Transportation Security Administration announced Friday that the maximum civil penalty for a firearms violation would be $14,950, an increase of about $1,000 from the current max penalty, as it contends with a record number of firearms being brought to security checkpoints at airports around the country. GUNS ARE A NO-NO : TSA said that it has stopped more than 6,300 firearms in 2022 as of Dec. 16, and more than 88 percent of intercepted firearms were loaded. TSA anticipates a 10 percent increase over 2021, when 5,972 firearms were intercepted in what was then a record. Firearm violations decreased during the pandemic but jumped dramatically in 2021 after travelers returned to the skies. LINE SKIPPING: Congress passed a sprawling $847 billion defense policy bill last week, H.R. 7776 (117), that most notably rescinds the Pentagon vaccine mandate and included the $18.9 billion Coast Guard Authorization Act. But it also includes a TSA pilot program that allows passengers and their bags from six international airports to skip a second security screening in the U.S. before they board a connecting flight. The language does not specify which six airports would qualify for the pilot program, which would run for up to five years. Broader bill awaits action : A standalone House bill, H.R. 4094 (117), to institute a pilot program passed by voice vote last year while the language was also included in a broader travel and tourism package considered by the Senate Commerce Committee, S. 3375 (117). The larger Senate bill, which hasn't received a vote, would establish an assistant secretary for travel and tourism in the Commerce Department and set a national tourism strategy. AIRLINES OPPOSE REFUND CHANGES : Friday marked the close of an extended comment period for DOT's proposed refund changes after airlines asked for more time, and not surprisingly, they are opposed to stricter rules on when they would need to compensate passengers for delayed or canceled flights. BLAME COVID, NOT US : The International Air Transport Association, which represents airlines around the world, said it opposes efforts to define what counts as a significant change to a passenger's itinerary. DOT is proposing a "significant change" as a departure or arrival time that's off by at least three hours for domestic flights and six hours for international flights. A refund would also be granted if a traveler would face a downgrade in amenities or other features, such as a smaller aircraft. IATA argued that the proposed changes are in response to an uptick of passenger complaints related to the pandemic, and the surge in dissatisfaction was due to Covid-specific rules and staffing issues. "It seems quite clear that the NPRM would not have been pursued but for the complaints received from passengers regarding airline refund policies during the COVID-19 pandemic," IATA wrote in its comments to DOT. "Pursuing regulation after the fact based on complaints about a once-in-a-lifetime travel disruption caused by government-imposed restrictions is not sound policy." A final rule on the matter from DOT is expected some time next year.
|
Comments
Post a Comment