MISSED OPPORTUNITY? — DHS's decision to direct the Cyber Safety Review Board to study the Lapsus$ hacker ring is drawing a mixture of criticism and praise from the cybersecurity community, with experts divided about the value of probing a group whose remarkable success and conspicuous style have already made it the subject of extensive public review. The argument for — A member of the 10-month-old independent investigatory group, which is staffed by public and private cybersecurity experts, told MC they were happy with the decision to make Lapsus$ the focus of board's second-ever review because it represented "the most dangerous threat actor today … and it's not even close." The individual, who was granted anonymity to speak openly about the board, defended the idea that a review of Lapsus$ could add significant value to the community, even though there is voluminous reporting on how it used basic malware and innovative social engineering techniques to run amok through well-resourced technology companies, among them Okta, Uber, Microsoft and Rockstar Games. "To the best of our knowledge, there has not been a public, comprehensive review of Lapsus$ tradecraft, or why they were so effective against the most well-resourced companies on the planet," said the CSRB board member. Because their techniques will likely be picked up by other hacking groups, "a CSRB review can add significant value to the community,'' added the individual. The argument against — The shortcomings of DHS's choice have less to do with what it did direct the independent board to study than what it didn't, argued Trey Herr, director of the Atlantic Council's Cyber Statecraft Initiative. "The government is giving up an opportunity to do a whole lot more," said Herr, who lamented that the government and private sector already have multiple projects dedicated to understanding Lapsus$ and the digital extortion racket more broadly. Meanwhile, the CSRB has again punted on the idea of conducting a review of the SolarWinds campaign — the issue President Joe Biden first directed the board to investigate when he established the CSRB in May 2021. Official response? — Asked why DHS neglected to assign a study of the infamous Russian campaign for the second time, a spokesperson for the department told MC it conducts reviews on topics "that are most relevant to the current threat landscape and that can have an immediate impact." "The review into Lapsus$ is a clear opportunity to achieve that," continued the spokesperson. Room for improvement — Six other security experts and former U.S. officials who spoke with MC came out 4-2 in favor of the Lapsus$ choice. But almost every one qualified their answers because they weren't sure why the board made its choice or where they intended to take the study. And that speaks to a related issue for the CSRB, said Josh Corman, former chief strategist on CISA's Covid-19 task force. "The need for a trustworthy institution like the CSRB cannot be understated," said Corman, now vice president of cyber safety strategy at Claroty. But "to establish that trust, it likely needs greater transparency regarding the criteria and process for nominating, prioritizing and selecting different topics."
|
Comments
Post a Comment