NO RULES, JUST RIGHT — The House has a speaker, now it needs some rules. The chamber is set to vote tonight on a package of rules governing the House for the next two years. But for all the discussion of concessions Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) made on his long slog toward the gavel, most aren't in the rules package. WRITTEN IN INK — One major concession that is written into the package is to allow just one member of the House to introduce a motion to "vacate the chair," which could force a vote of no confidence on McCarthy's speakership. McCarthy had initially pledged to block the revival of the procedural tool, then relented to allow five members of the majority to inflict it. Now it is down to just one member, from either party. Also written into the rules is a 72-hour period required between bills being made public and when they are brought to the floor. That has been the case before — including under Democrats in the 117th Congress — but the requirement is easily waived. Conservatives came to the table last week with a lot of wins already stacked up in the rules package that was first released by GOP leadership more than a week ago. They had pushed for, and won, provisions that require bills to be about a single subject — part of an effort to cut down on sprawling, take-it-or-leave-it bills. But there aren't mechanisms for enforcement in the text. The Freedom Caucus also won a victory with a requirement that the House vote on any motions to waive germaneness for amendments, which would make attaching provisions dealing with different subjects than the underlying bill more difficult. GENTLEMEN'S HANDSHAKES — But most of the concessions aren't aren't up for a vote today. They are handshake agreements made as McCarthy desperately scrambled for votes last week. McCarthy has promised floor votes on an array of priority bills from the conservative flank of his party, including on border security, term limits for House members and a balanced budget amendment. The House Freedom Caucus and other key conservatives demanded more representation on key committees, and they walked away satisfied with an off-the-books commitment from McCarthy that they would get three seats on the House Rules Committee. The panel controls what legislation makes it to the House floor, as well as which amendments are made in order for debate. Reshaping the panel could have a significant impact on how legislation moves through Congress. Packing House Rules with conservatives could also accomplish another demand from the right flank of the GOP conference — to allow many more amendments to be offered on the House floor. They want to return to the days of "open rules," aka amendment free-for-alls, especially on spending bills. Speaking of spending: Promises have been made to try and cap discretionary spending at fiscal 2022 levels. Those are lower than the current enacted spending levels, which would lead to a potential 10 percent cut to defense spending and additional cuts to domestic spending, which is sure to stir trouble in the Senate. House Appropriations Committee ranking member Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) said the spending bill promise "kills the 2024 government funding process before it has even started, all but guaranteeing a shutdown." Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) likes the Rules package, calling it "open, fair and fiscally conservative," but she is considering withholding her vote because she doesn't have the details of what McCarthy's opponents were able to extract behind closed doors. "We don't know what they got, or didn't get. We haven't seen it. We don't have any idea what promises were made or what gentleman's handshakes were made," she told CBS' Face the Nation. She is especially concerned about cuts to defense spending. Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-Texas) has also threatened to oppose the rules package. McCarthy can only lose four votes. Conservatives don't seem worried that some of their key demands are not inked into the House Rules package, after proving during the speaker votes that a small alliance can wield disproportionate power. "We will use the tools of the House to enforce the terms of the agreement," Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) told CNN's State of the Union on Sunday. Also on the agenda: The House will vote today on a bill from Rep. Adrian Smith (R-Neb.) that would roll back $80 billion in IRS funding that was part of the Inflation Reduction Act. This week: The House will consider a resolution to establish a new committee to investigate the alleged "weaponization of the FBI" against its political foes. The panel is modeled after the Church Committee, which investigated U.S. intelligence agencies in 1975. Republicans want the panel to have unbridled funding, in contrast to their criticism of the costs run up by the Jan. 6 select committee. Read the resolution here and Kyle's story: Proposed GOP select panel would be empowered to review 'ongoing criminal investigations' RELATED: Republicans Prepare New Rules, but Fixing Congress Isn't So Easy, from Carl Hulse at The New York Times
|
Comments
Post a Comment