THE BUZZ: Gov. Gavin Newsom’s plan to help some of California’s most vulnerable homeless residents sailed through the Legislature last year with near-unanimous support. Now comes the hard part. Today, members of the CARE Act working group will meet for the first time to chart a course for implementing the new mental health arm of civil courts set to launch in seven counties in October. The success of these first counties will set the tone for the other 51 California counties, where the program will launch in 2024. It will also matter to other states, cities and federal actors eager to evaluate a novel approach to homelessness. As with any first-in-the-nation program, the process of building out the system requires careful planning. CARE Court is designed to bring together first responders, the judicial branch and county staff to reach a subsect of the population that often falls through the cracks. Disability and civil rights groups are already challenging it in court, and questions remain about how to establish — and fund — such a system. The pioneering group of counties has been working with state agencies to develop their plans, each of which will be different, said Sami Gallegos, spokesperson for California Health and Human Services. Technical assistance and training is “in development,” Gallegos added, and will roll out soon. As with most things in California, housing is the overarching concern. The group’s 26 members — including Disability Rights California, one of the organizations suing the state over the program — today will discuss meeting the housing needs of individuals who enter into CARE plans. Last year, Newsom signed off on $1.5 billion in the budget for “bridge” housing, meant to get people off the street and shelter them until they find a permanent home. But with gloomy revenue projections on the horizon, the governor is now proposing delaying $250 million of those funds to next year. That could change if tax revenues change course. Then there’s the staff. County behavioral health workers will be responsible for evaluating individuals brought before the court to determine if they meet the right criteria for the program, in addition to providing services. Right now, counties don’t know how many staff they’ll need to provide that care, said Michelle Doty Cabrera, executive director of the County Behavioral Health Directors Association. And a recent study from UC San Francisco researchers outlined a “workforce crisis” among behavioral health workers. It’ll be a few months before we have more detailed CARE Court plans — and likely years before we can measure the full impact of the program. But today’s meeting will get the ball rolling on this closely watched initiative. Relatedly, in New York City, POLITICO’s Maya Kaufman got an inside look at how Mayor Eric Adams is instructing health care workers to implement his plan to involuntarily hospitalize more mentally ill people. Newsom, notably, has drawn a distinction between his plan and ones like Adams’— calling CARE Courts the “right way” to tackle the problem. BUENOS DÍAS, good Tuesday morning. Today, we’re keeping an eye on the Assembly Public Safety Committee, where members will hear bills on cryptocurrency, firearms, penalties for drug dealers and more. And a Happy Valentine’s Day to our California Playbook readers! In lieu of flowers or chocolate, we ask that you send news tips. Got a tip or story idea for California Playbook? Hit us up at jwhite@politico.com and lkorte@politico.com or follow us on Twitter @JeremyBWhite and @Lara_Korte. QUOTE OF THE DAY: “... our leaders completely failed. And they continue to fail; despite all the beautiful words and pledges, they are not moving in the right direction.” Climate change activist Greta Thunberg, lamenting the remarkably small amount of government investment into green energy in an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times. TWEET OF THE DAY:
|
Comments
Post a Comment