HEADWINDS FOR REPUBLICANS: Emergency pandemic-era SNAP benefits are ending this month. And, work requirements that had been paused during the pandemic are returning as well as the public health emergency is set to end in May. “I don't think it's appropriate, especially given the fact that so many families are struggling under this Biden inflation and which makes it tough,” Thompson said of any SNAP cuts or new work requirements in the debt limit fight. Real world impact: The return of work requirements will bring additional challenges for SNAP recipients and their caseworkers — especially for the most vulnerable. Those seeking SNAP who have limited or no access to identification can end up locked out of work requirements and their benefits, according to Wilfredo Morales, a caseworker who registers people for SNAP at St. John’s Bread and Life in Brooklyn, New York. That’s because many companies and hiring facilities might not accept anything short of government-issued ID for employment. It can take months and in some cases years to obtain personal identification, especially for those starting without even a birth certificate or Social Security card. “If you hit the brick wall and you don’t give them that document, you will be discontinued,” Morales said. What to do about ABAWDs: The return of work requirements is sure to bring back congressional debate over able-bodied adults without dependents. ABAWDs are usually the target of imposed work requirements, but vulnerable populations might not be able to verify their work. “Our single population here, who can maybe get day laborer work, that’s problematic for them,” said Sister Marie Sorenson, the associate executive director at St. John’s Bread and Life. Democrats, meanwhile, are livid about federal food assistance being in GOP crosshairs. They note part of the current debt was created during former President Donald Trump’s presidency, when Republicans passed a tax cuts package. “I can't imagine anything more cynical than paying for a tax cut for billionaires with food assistance for people who are struggling and on the edge of going hungry,” said Rep. Josh Harder (D-Calif.). “Yet, that's exactly what they're proposing.” Rep. Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, said Republicans’ specific plans are still unclear. But if the GOP pursues returning to 2022 budget levels, it would mean “massive cuts across the board,” possibly 18 percent, she said. “So they’re prepared to cut everything.” CHINA U.S. AG LAND DEBATE: As the U.S. reevaluates its relationship with China, the debate over whether Congress needs to enter the fray over Chinese and other foreign entities buying U.S. farmland, sometimes close to military installations, is reaching a fever pitch. While the calls for a federal ban on China buying up U.S. farmland are growing on Capitol Hill, one key Republican has yet to sound off: House Ag Chair Thompson. “There were a lot of members that because it was on cable news, they wanted to shoot from the hip,” Thompson told MA in January. “I came out of health care, I don't do that. We'll take action once we have facts.” Future hearing: As we’ve reported, Thompson has already requested a review of the matter from the Comptroller General Gene Dodaro. Now, he tells MA he wants to hold a hearing on it in the coming months, possibly by April. (Though it’s likely the federal review he’s requested takes longer, which could push that hearing closer to the summer.) As part of the speaker race battle, a group of far-right Republicans, included in their demands to Kevin McCarthy that “the farm bill must … block Chinese government land-buying. (That rhetoric is likely to only ratchet up after the GOP uproar over the recent Chinese balloon.) But, according to Thompson, it won’t be part of the farm bill, but instead will be a separate process. “I don't believe that's a farm bill issue,” Thompson said. “And the Ag Committee can walk and chew gum. We also have to do cryptocurrency — and thank god that's not in the farm bill.” Thompson and other farm-state lawmakers acknowledge there are serious national security concerns in specific states, including around one proposed Chinese-owned corn mill near an Air Force base in North Dakota. Land purchases by foreign entities with national security implications are supposed to be reviewed by a federal body, but some lawmakers recently have expressed concerns about that process, pushing for USDA to get more involved. Still, Republicans are divided about the way forward. “I’m always very sensitive to federalizing something,” said former House Ag Chair Frank Lucas (R-Okla.). Senate Ag Republicans Mike Braun (Ind.) and Roger Marshall (Kan.) both said it was critical to carefully craft any plans so they protect personal property rights and avoid government overreach. Now, a growing number of their Republican (and a few Democratic) colleagues are prepping a firehose of legislation on the topic. Thompson predicted “we’ll see thousands of bills” in the meantime. One new bill, as we’ve reported, goes beyond China, and also targets Russia, Iran and North Korea. Last week, Sens. Jon Tester (D-Mont.) and Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) introduced their Promoting Agriculture Safeguards and Security Act — the Senate version of a bill from House Ag members Jim Costa (D-Calif.) and Rick Crawford (R-Ark.) and Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y). 2024 impact: It’s clear from the rhetoric on Capitol Hill that the issue will feature heavily in key 2024 races, including in Montana, a red state where Tester is up for reelection.
|
Comments
Post a Comment