BACK TO PILLAR ONE: The OECD has already pushed back the implementation timeline for Pillar One until 2024, but even that might seem ambitious, given that negotiators are still working on technical details. And then there’s the U.S., where Democrats and Republicans are deeply divided over the minimum tax — and it’s hard to find many people at all that foresee Pillar One gaining traction anytime soon. (Part of the issue there: Implementing Pillar One likely requires changing tax treaties, which requires a two-thirds supermajority in the Senate — and, well, good luck there.) So now what? It’s not clear if Le Maire’s remarks on the U.S. blocking Pillar One stem solely from its current status in Congress, or if he’s gathered further reasons for pessimism. Also not clear: When or even if other governments might actually start moving toward DST’s, even if keen international tax observers in D.C. were far from surprised by Le Maire’s comments. But it’s interesting to think about how Democrats might respond to just that sort of situation, especially if it should happen during the Biden administration — given the leading role that Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and her deputies had in crafting the OECD agreement. In years past, Democrats and Republicans alike called out foreign governments that considered digital services taxes. But if nothing else, it’s a more complicated calculus for Democrats should another showdown over DST’s occur, considering that it would be occurring because of the gridlock over the global tax deal. And let’s just put it this way: There was no consensus among the experts that Weekly Tax spoke to over whether Democrats would get on board with retaliatory tariffs — a response not uncommon from the U.S. in recent years, to a variety of policies abroad — should other governments start enacting DST’s. As an aside: House Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith (R-Mo.) talked up the possibility of trade retaliation to the global minimum tax in a recent letter to OECD brass. But that would require some help from Democrats in Congress and/or the administration, so don’t expect that any time soon, either. MORE OF A SUGGESTION, REALLY: It has now been six months and four days since Yellen gave the IRS half a year to craft a battle plan for implementing the $80 billion in new funding that Democrats gave the agency in last summer’s Inflation Reduction Act. But as Law360’s David van den Berg reported late last week, the IRS blew right by that deadline for getting the plan to Yellen, and will only say that it will send it over to Treasury in the “coming weeks.” Treasury officials had already been saying that it would be a while before the implementation plan might be publicly released, in part because Yellen and the department would need to review it. And that was before the IRS said it wouldn’t meet the deadline, so it’s anyone’s guess now when that document might see the light of day. Something else to keep in mind: Sen. Mike Crapo of Idaho, the top Republican on the Finance Committee, expressed some doubt last week that the IRS implementation plan would ever be released publicly. Crapo said that at the confirmation hearing for Danny Werfel, Biden’s pick to be IRS commissioner. Werfel vowed to be transparent with how the IRS implemented the $80 billion, but didn’t exactly say the plan would be released. LIFE FOR LIFO? Sens. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Tim Scott (R-S.C.) rolled out legislation last week to offer tax relief to auto dealers that faced inventory issues because of global supply chain problems. In all, half of the Senate is sponsoring the bill, which gives some help to businesses that use LIFO, or the last in, first out accounting method. Companies that use LIFO can face tax penalties if they don’t meet certain inventory thresholds, a problem that cropped up for lots of car dealers in recent years. The Brown and Scott bill — and its companion bill in the House — would give dealers as many as three years to restock their inventory for 2020 or 2021 before having to pay tax penalties. The Senate actually passed a version of the bill in the dying days of the last Congress, but the measure didn’t clear the House.
|
Comments
Post a Comment