CHINA-AG LAND DEBATE: MA spoke with Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), the only working farmer in the Senate, about his new legislation to ban U.S. adversaries from buying American farmland — that includes Chinese, Iranian, North Korean and Russian business entities. As we’ve reported, the push on Capitol Hill for the federal government to crackdown on Chinese and other foreign entities buying U.S. farmland, sometimes close to military installations, is reaching a fever pitch. The Air Force recently said that a proposed Chinese grain facility close to its base near Grand Forks, N.D., presented national security concerns. The debate, Tester noted, has grown even hotter after a Chinese spy balloon recently traversed the U.S. before being shot down, and as the U.S. is reevaluating its relationship with Beijing and Chinese investment. Tester, who is up for reelection in 2024 in a red state, and Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), just introduced their Promoting Agriculture Safeguards and Security Act — with Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y) and House Ag members Jim Costa (D-Calif.) and Rick Crawford (R-Ark.). Here’s part of Meredith’s conversation with Tester. Q: Tell us more about the PASS Act and how you see the issue of foreign land ownership impacting Montana. Tester: I think it needs to be divided up into adversarial countries who own farmland, and other folks. I think this bill is really [focused] on China and Russia and North Korea, Iran. And, quite honestly, I think it is inappropriate for any four of those countries to buy or have ownership of land in this country. I think it puts security and national security at risk. And that's really what this bill is focused at. It's focused at ag land, it's also focused at agribusiness. And I think the [Chinese spy balloon], it just added to this. This hasn't been around since last week. It's been around for a long time. And quite honestly, it's something that I heard. I did a series of farm listening sessions the second week in January. It is something I heard there and got together with [Sen. Mike] Rounds and we dropped this bill in. But the bottom line is this is about making sure we keep America the greatest country in the world economically and militarily. And if you've got China that owns farmland, particularly in key places of this country, it's a real problem. Q: Some of your other colleagues have cited concerns about personal property rights and federalizing this issue. Why do you think federal law is important here and how does this legislation in particular navigate around personal property rights? Tester: Number one, I think it's important because we have an organization that could actually enforce this, called the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, otherwise known as CFIUS. That's why I think it's a federal issue. The other question was private property rights, which I am absolutely, unequivocally 100 percent a private property rights guy. And I think you need to have a willing buyer and willing seller, with one exception. And that exception is whether these people are part of the Chinese Communist Party that want to do us harm, or North Korea, who want to see us go away, or Russia, and I talk about them, or Iran. Other than that, go. Somebody asked me a question today — they said the farmland, it'll be worth a lot less. No it won't. And if they're offered exorbitant figures, there's probably a national security issue that they're doing that for. I think we're all Americans and this is the greatest country in the world. And I think this is just the right policy. Q: What is the scope of people who should be scrutinized or banned from buying U.S. farmland from adversarial countries? What does that look like to you? Tester: Any company that does business in China, any Chinese company is part of the Chinese Communist Party. It's just the way it is. So it makes it pretty easy. Q: So Chinese firms is your thinking? Tester: Yeah that's right. Because, it's no different than TikTok. I mean, they're doing business with the government. Q: The House Ag Chair has lamented this becoming a pretty hot cable news issue. He's obviously digging into it, but he's a little concerned about some of the talking points, especially among his Republicans who maybe aren't very steeped in ag policy. I'm just wondering your thoughts about that. Tester: So I don't know what he said. And look, I know for a fact that there's a lot of folks that don't understand rural America around here and don’t understand production agriculture. But I can also tell you that I still farm, I'm still involved in production agriculture. It's what I've done for my whole life and I mean literally my whole life. And I can tell you that, I didn't hear his comments so I don't know what he said, but the truth is that I want to make sure agriculture continues. I want to make sure private property rights are protected. But look, I also want to make sure this country remains the world's biggest economic driver and we continue to lead the world as a military power. And I just think that this bill helps ensure that. Now, I will tell you, there were things that people said about the [Chinese spy balloon] that totally blew it out of shape from a political standpoint, and [they] weren't dealing with it from a national security standpoint. And if that's the angle he's going, I agree with that. This is about national security. This is about making sure that we can maintain our position in the world. Nothing more, nothing less.
|
Comments
Post a Comment