LONG HAUL: The trucking industry wants California to be like Texas. Or maybe Nebraska. Or, for that matter, like any of at least five states that have rejected proposals to require a human on board all self-driving trucks — which the tech industry hopes will be rolling down roads in the not-too-distant future. California, so far, is saying no way. Legislation that would require humans on board easily passed in the Assembly last month and is now coming up in the Senate. Fierce lobbying is underway. The Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association, representing both tech and trucking, is trying to make the case that the robots don’t need a human minder, and they’ve been able to persuade other states to agree. “We’ve been very successful in beating these back in several states this past legislative session and we’re continuing to make the case in California,” said Jeff Farrah, the association’s executive director. California wants limits on autonomous trucks for two main reasons. One is that the powerful Teamsters union is strongly opposed to cutting humans out of a field that employs more than 3 million people in relatively well-paid positions. The other is safety: Lawmakers, like a lot of other folks, are uneasy with the prospect of 80,000 pounds of steel and merchandise hurtling down I-5 with no one on board. Count Assemblymember Laura Friedman among those who remain unconvinced by the industry, pointing to lingering doubts about self-driving vehicles in California and elsewhere. “People just want to know the technology is safe before it goes into the largest, heaviest vehicles without a driver,” said Friedman, who chairs the Assembly Transportation Committee. AB 316, which would require humans on board and includes Friedman in a long list of cosponsors, cleared the Assembly on a 69-4 vote and is scheduled for a hearing in the Senate Transportation Committee on July 11. The trucking and tech companies behind autonomous vehicles are making the case that California — where California-based Waymo and Cruise operate self-driving taxis in San Francisco — could be left behind as the rest of the country embraces the new technology. They’re up against the Teamsters, which has made the California proposal its top priority, said Jason Rabinowitz, president of the union’s chapter in Northern California and Nevada. “The public recognizes that the technology’s not ready for prime time,” Rabinowitz said. “We’ve seen these robot taxis interfering with emergency vehicles and unfortunately ran over some people’s dogs.” Rabinowitz said passage of the California bill could prompt other states to follow suit with similar bans. Other states are allowing testing, but autonomous trucks are not yet in regular use without humans on board. AB 316 would allow companies to test self-driving trucks with humans on board on public roads and without humans on private roads, but the DMV is still working on regulations. The Legislature is advancing its legislation on heavy-duty trucks amid mistrust of the DMV’s regulatory process. “There’s some dispute about whether the DMV has been a little too lenient with some of the marketing claims made by some of the companies and their abilities,” Friedman said. The Legislature may revisit the subject of self-driving trucks as more evidence emerges. “We all need to feel more confident before we just throw the doors open,” she said. HAPPY WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON! Welcome to California Playbook PM, a POLITICO newsletter that serves as an afternoon temperature check of California politics and a look at what our policy reporters are watching. Got tips or suggestions? Shoot an email to wventeicher@politico.com or send a shout on Twitter. DMs are open!
|
Comments
Post a Comment