BALANCE SHEETS OF POWER: What looks like a wonky technical tweak to a landmark health care affordability law is the latest point of contention in long-running disputes between doctors and the labor groups that represent health care employees. The proposed change has frustrated Kaiser, the California Medical Association and other groups that say the union and lawmakers are reneging on a deal last year in which they agreed to release financial details with the understanding that they’d be kept secret. “We’re here talking about proposals that did not make it into the final agreement,” California Medical Association Lobbyist Brandon Marchy testified at a recent committee hearing. “This is not how good-faith negotiations should be made or honored afterwards.” Hospitals and health plans already have to report financial data to the state’s newly created Office of Health Care Affordability as part of an effort to set cost targets and rein in the ever-inflating cost of care. But the new bill, AB 616, would open large medical groups’ financial books to the public instead of housing them behind closed doors in an alphabet soup of government agencies. Like with other financial reports on hospitals or plans, the high-level financial data would be available online. Getting this health care affordability office off the ground was no small feat. It took months of negotiations with nearly every actor in the health care industry. Medical groups, like Kaiser Permanente, say they made it clear they were willing to participate only if they could be sure their financial information was kept confidential. But it’s a new year and a new Legislature — and some lawmakers don’t care what deals were cut last year. “I understand there was a lot of negotiations last year, that there was a deal struck,” Senate Health Committee Chair Susan Talamantes Eggman said at a recent hearing. “I wasn’t a part of that politics … and this policy seems fair.” SEIU-UHW, a health care union that is negotiating with Kaiser Permanente on behalf of 57,000 union members, wants high-level information like balance sheets, revenue and costs to be available to people who research the health care industry, purchase health plans or oversee the markets. Proponents of the bill argue that making such information public is key to monitoring the financial solvency of ever-consolidating medical groups and providing regulators and academics with real information on where health care dollars are going. They also note that financial disclosure has become increasingly common at the state and federal level. It’s not unusual for lawmakers to pass a big bill and then later adjust the language, said Anthony Wright, the executive director of Health Access California, which was involved in negotiations to create the office. “This is what we agreed on — and there were certain things we wanted that weren’t included — but that doesn’t mean we stop advocating for our long-standing policy goals.” HAPPY TUESDAY AFTERNOON! Welcome to California Playbook PM, a POLITICO newsletter that serves as an afternoon temperature check of California politics and a look at what our policy reporters are watching. Got tips or suggestions? Shoot an email to rbluth@politico.com or send a shout on Twitter. DMs are open!
|
Comments
Post a Comment