TRUMP INDICTED IN GEORGIA Former President Donald Trump and 18 others were indicted overnight on racketeering charges by a Georgia grand jury for attempting to subvert President Joe Biden’s win in the state in the 2020 election. Among the former president’s 18 co-defendants was former Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), the onetime chair of the House Freedom Caucus who resigned to become Trump’s White House chief of staff. Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.), the current Freedom Caucus chairman, is also briefly mentioned in the indictment as the recipient of a text message from Meadows, who was seeking contact information for Pennsylvania state legislative leaders. Former Rep. Jody Hice (R-Ga.) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) both testified before a special grand jury impaneled by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, though neither were mentioned in Monday’s indictment. Trump’s fourth indictment seems to have done little to alter the political fires surrounding his legal woes. McCarthy reacted with anger, saying “justice should be blind” but nonetheless accusing Willis of charging Trump and others for the benefit of her political career. “Today’s indictment is just the latest political attack in the Democrats’ WITCH HUNT against President Trump,” House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) said in a tweet. Not unexpectedly, perhaps, there was not much of an immediate reaction from Senate Republican leadership, where support for Trump has long since dissipated. “The American people can decide whether they want him to be president or not. This should be decided at the ballot box, not in a bunch of liberal jurisdictions trying to put the man in jail,” Graham said on Fox News late Monday. Capitol Hill’s two senior-most Democrats — Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries — said the indictment indicated “a repeated pattern of criminal activity by the former president” and urged Trump and his supporters to allow the legal process to play out without interference. MGP’s PATH-BREAKING PITCH ON WILDFIRES UNDERWOOD, Wash. – As Maui reels from a devastating blaze — the deadliest in U.S. history — one up-and-coming Democrat is urging her own party to change the way it thinks about wildfires. Blazes like Hawaii’s and one earlier this summer in Canada that doused the East Coast in dangerous levels of smoke have focused national attention on the heavy toll of wildfires. But for first-term Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-Wash.), they were already an acute and increasing annual problem for her Southwest Washington district. And Gluesenkamp Perez is ready to see Democrats talk about out-of-control wildfires in a new way. The newly minted Blue Dog Democrat, who recently joined Republicans in voting to roll back the Biden administration’s student debt relief plan, took a subtle but unmistakable jab at the hands-off approach to the environment that’s popular among green groups. “I think that one of the downfalls of the modern environmental movement is conceptualizing nature as a terrarium — [that] it's something that you can't interact with, or you're going to ruin it,” Gluesenkamp Perez said from a roadside lookout over the Columbia River Gorge, about 45 minutes from her home in Washington’s Skamania County. She spoke while standing above the charred remains of trees where a handful of homes burned in the Tunnel 5 Fire in July. Political risk factor: Gluesenkamp Perez, who won her battleground seat by emphasizing her background as a small business owner and tradesperson alongside and her support for abortion rights, has become one of the 118th Congress’ most highly scrutinized first-termers. Slate and The New York Times recently reported on backlash she’s received for her occasional tendency to buck her party — and Fox News at the same time honed in on comments she made about rebuilding the Blue Dogs as an “antifascist rural” group. So her call for a more all-of-the-above approach to wildfire management, combining pure conservation with better forest management, may attract outsized attention. When asked if authorities’ hands-off approach to forests after more than a century of logging has contributed to the problem, Gluesenkamp Perez agreed. “You can't stick your finger in something for generations and then walk away from it and pretend like you absolved yourself because you're not going to touch it anymore,” she said. A blend of both parties: Democrats traditionally have treated wildfire prevention and management in the larger context of long-term efforts to prevent climate change. Republicans, however, have started pushing for better forest management — such as the National Forest Service’s practice of using prescribed burns to prevent or lessen the severity of fires. Rep. Marc Molinaro (R-N.Y.), for example, told Fox News in June that Canada “needs to focus on forest management,” adding that it wasn’t the moment to “lecture people about the science of climate change.” Redrawing the lines: Driving through Skamania County, Gluesenkamp Perez pointed out more patches of burned trees that were scattered between homes with foot-wide strips of peeling paint. The paint melted during last month’s fire, she explained. Asked about the partisan lines forming in Congress on wildfire prevention and climate change, Gluesenkamp Perez suggested that the issue breaks down less by party affiliation and more about a lawmaker’s home district. The divide occurs between rural and urban areas, she said, and between regions that do and do not experience fires on the regular. “If it's your baby that can't go outside during wildfire seasons, you feel a little bit differently about the time horizon that's acceptable to address our woods going up in smoke,” she said. To that point, Idaho Republican Rep. Russ Fulcher and Colorado Democrat Rep. Joe Neguse are two lawmakers she said are also thinking critically about how the federal government can address the issue. Fulcher and Gluesenkamp Perez introduced a forest management bill in March that has already unanimously cleared the House Agriculture Natural Resources Committees. A granddaughter of loggers, Gluesenkamp Perez proposed the immediate solution of getting people who live and work in the woods involved with preserving them. That might look a bit different from what some of her urban- and East Coast-based Democratic colleagues want. “I want to see a world where loggers are the vanguard of environmentalism,” she added. “These are people that love the woods, and that's why they choose to make their living there.” – Natalie Fertig
|
Comments
Post a Comment