FOUR INDICTMENTS AND AN EXPUNGEMENT? House Republicans first flirted with nullifying Donald Trump’s impeachments back when the former president faced only two indictments. Now that number has doubled, and the manager of Trump’s second impeachment — Rep. Jamie Raskin — simply laughed when asked about the GOP’s case for trying to erase Trump’s record. “They could pass expungements, reversals, nullifications, apologies, pardons and valentines to Donald Trump, but it makes no difference,” the Maryland Democrat said in an interview. It’s an intriguing moment for Raskin, who built a national profile leading Trump’s post-Jan. 6 impeachment that nearly propelled him to a Senate bid while battling cancer. Now he’s in line to claim the Oversight Committee gavel if Democrats recapture the House next fall, a post that could put him again on the path to Trump accountability — even, and perhaps especially, if the former president claims a second term. But for now, as Raskin sees his post-Jan. 6 work borne out in the courts, the constitutional law expert appears content to let the judicial system work its will on Trump. Even if House Republicans did try to pass some kind of expungement — as some Trump allies say Speaker Kevin McCarthy has promised — Raskin shrugged off its impact. “Whatever they want to accomplish on the floor will have no bearing in any way on what takes place in court. And it should not,” he said. “We have an independent judiciary. And the legal process operates quite apart from whatever legislators say and do.” Expungement primer: McCarthy has denied that he promised Trump a House vote on symbolically erasing the two impeachments, but Republican lawmakers close to him have offered resolutions to do just that. House GOP Conference Chair Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) and Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) teamed up earlier this summer on the measures. But any vote on absolving Trump remains nausea-inducing for Republican moderates, putting McCarthy in a familiar spot: balancing the interests of his Trump-loving right flank and MAGA-skeptic centrists. Who’s on the back foot? Now that Trump has more indictments than Troy Aikman has Super Bowl rings, Democrats like Raskin are more inclined to go on offense about House GOP attempts to block and tackle for the polarizing former POTUS. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) called the House push to expunge Trump’s impeachments a symptom of a “deeper problem within the Republican Party.” “The right-wingers in the House seem to want to impeach somebody else every day,” Van Hollen told reporters on Tuesday. “Some of them are talking about Biden now. In my view, this is another symptom of just how extreme right the House caucus has become. And the fact that they can't seem to get organized around doing the people's business.” Rep. Nikema Williams (D-Ga.), who represents the Fulton County area that delivered the latest charges against Trump, described his fourth indictment as “an important day, because Fulton County demonstrated that no one — not even a failed former president — is above the law.” Let’s not forget: During last year’s midterms, Democrats openly debated how much Trump should play into their campaign message. Many of them credited their better-than-expected performance to the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade and the spotlight it shined on the GOP’s abortion policies, not on Trump’s legacy. But four indictments later, with Trump potentially back on the ballot in November, all that has changed. – Daniella Diaz
|
Comments
Post a Comment