WHAT’S NEXT ON SANTOS Rep. George Santos is no more. But there are some significant remaining questions regarding his ouster, both for the House generally and him personally. For the House: Will this new precedent have lasting repercussions? The handful of Democrats who opposed booting Santos or voted “present” cited concerns about due process, given this is the first time since the Civil War the House has expelled a member without a conviction. Rep. Al Green (D-Texas), who voted present, told POLITICO the vote had “opened Pandora’s coffin,” a sentiment echoed by Rep. Bobby Scott (D-Va.), who voted against the expulsion. “We have to recognize that expelling a Member is one of the most serious and solemn actions Members can take. We have to recognize that precedence will be set,” he said. One related example: The House formerly considered censuring members a punishment to use only in the rarest of circumstances. That’s obviously changed now, with Republicans and Democrats using reprimand measures several times just this year. Still, there are more backstops to keep that from happening on expulsion. Process wise, the two-thirds majority required for booting a member makes it much more difficult to achieve. Plus, very few lawmakers would argue that Santos himself didn’t present a special case after the damning bipartisan Ethics Committee report, even if they didn’t think it was enough to vote for expulsion. “Do I get concerned about this turning into tits-for-tats? Sure,” Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) said. “But the reality here is: You had an individual who was completely unfit to serve, who defrauded the voters of his district, who defrauded donors." Worth noting: Ethics Committee Chair Michael Guest (R-Miss.), who sponsored the successful resolution to boot Santos, said he wasn’t worried about precedent at all. “I think that we have seen members that have committed crimes far less than this who have chosen to resign. I think that this is the exception to the rule,” he said Friday, echoing arguments made by other members of the panel. For Santos: The indicted and now-ousted lawmaker is still part of the exclusive club of former members of Congress, but he won’t get all the perks. Santos said Thursday that he’ll retain his floor access, a privilege open to all former members who aren’t registered lobbyists. Within 24 hours, he seemed to dismiss the idea of using his floor privileges: "Why would I want to stay here? To hell with this place.” Santos has said he plans to write a book and declined to comment on whether he’d been approached by reality TV shows, as Olivia wrote Thursday. Need not apply: Santos will not get an invitation to join the U.S. Association of Former Members of Congress. The group does not welcome members “who are not in good standing at the end of their Congressional tenure,” said a spokesperson for the group. About his remaining staff: With Santos out, the House Clerk’s office will take control of his office and staff to provide constituent services until an upcoming special election for his seat. No legislative work is allowed during the vacancy, but work on behalf of constituents can continue. Santos staffers are allowed to remain on the payroll of the House and keep working for the office until a successor is elected. However, the clerk is authorized to terminate employees. He could run again: Expelled members aren’t barred from seeking political office again. So if Santos wanted he could give Congress or other elected positions another shot. He indicated he wasn’t done with politics in a pen-and-pad meeting with reporters Thursday, but we’ll see if he follows through. Lobby hobby? Santos told reporters Thursday that he has no plans to lobby. That’s just as well. Expelled members aren’t exempt from the mandatory one year “cooling off” period before registering as lobbyists. — Katherine Tully-McManus, Daniella Diaz and Nicholas Wu, with assist from Jordain Carney
|
Comments
Post a Comment