CONGRESS IS ALREADY SHORT ON SPENDING-DEAL TIME Six weeks can seem like an eternity for deadline-obsessed lawmakers – but with the Jan. 19 expiration of the first tranche of stopgap government funding looming large on the calendar, we’re already seeing signs of trouble ahead. If you ask House Republicans, they’re waiting to hear from Senate Democrats on this week’s offer from Speaker Mike Johnson for a framework to fund the government through Oct. 1. Some GOP lawmakers are buzzing about a possible agreement on funding toplines as soon as this week, after conservatives in the Freedom Caucus signaled they’re willing to accept the budget totals set by this summer’s debt deal – spending levels they had long resisted. But several top Republican appropriators said on Tuesday that they’re unsure about that early level of agreement, even as staff-level talks between Johnson and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer quietly chug along. “I just don’t have any idea” when there will be a deal on so-called spending toplines, Rep. David Joyce (R-Ohio) said, adding that, “I do think we need to have some kind of skeletal framework” to head off shutdown deadlines in January and February. Rep. Chuck Fleischmann (R-Tenn.) said talks have been “positive” and “productive” but made clear that there’s more work to do in getting the fractious GOP conference on board. Why that’s a bad sign: Without agreement on toplines, lawmakers can’t go any further on writing spending bills. And many Democrats say there’s nothing left to negotiate on funding, insisting on the numbers set by the debt deal and nothing less. Those levels, after all, are likely the best Democrats can get for non-defense programs, given the GOP-controlled House. Even so, no matter how you slice it, non-defense funding is likely to suffer as part of any agreement that might get reached. And if Congress resorts to a stopgap spending measure until Oct. 1, those non-defense programs – think health care, education, and more – could get hit extra hard. Here’s where things get extra-wonky, so bear with us. The complicated math: Lawmakers themselves have admitted that they get tripped up by the debt deal agreed to earlier this year, which sliced non-defense funding down to $704 billion for this fiscal year – not including a handshake agreement loathed by conservatives that was intended to add tens of billions of extra dollars to soften the blow for Democrats. The debt deal also set up two separate scenarios for future funding cuts if Congress can’t come to an agreement. The first scenario: The government will not be funded for the full year on Jan. 1, triggering a change meant to nudge lawmakers into doing their jobs. What happens? The funding ceiling for domestic programs will reset to $736 billion, or last year’s level with a 1 percent cut (about $41 billion). That cap will be enforced on April 30 if any part of the government is operating under a temporary funding measure. The second scenario: If Congress resorts to another stopgap that extends current funding through the rest of the fiscal year – as Johnson has threatened to do if a deal isn’t reached – non-defense funding will dip even lower, to $704 billion. That would mean a massive $73 billion cut from current funding levels … if lawmakers don’t follow through with the handshake agreement we mentioned earlier. And when Freedom Caucus members agreed to those higher toplines, they made clear that they also want the handshake agreement revisited. So things could get dicey fast, despite the positive signals getting sent this week. More bad spending news: The Senate’s national security supplemental bill text debuted this afternoon – including everything President Joe Biden asked for, and more, including $1 billion for the FEMA grant program that gives money to places of worship for security measures. But without an elusive breakthrough in border security talks, the $110.5 billion funding package is likely to fall to a filibuster tomorrow. — Caitlin Emma, with an assist from Jennifer Scholtes
|
Comments
Post a Comment