GROVE PROBE: One Democratic state senator is calling on Attorney General Letitia James to throw out the results of a local election and oust a small-town mayor after he allegedly flouted election laws so he could continue running his town in a manner his critics likened to the “wild, wild west.” Orange County state Sen. James Skoufis says the mayor and trustees of the 4,000-person Village of South Blooming Grove engaged in a covert — and ultimately successful — operation to schedule an election for the unusual date of Oct. 22 because they knew a large chunk of voters would be out of town since local yeshivas would be closed. Now he wants James to overturn it. “I don't send this request to the Attorney General lightly at all,” Skoufis said. “But given the very crystal clear fact pattern here, I strongly believe that it warrants an invalidation of the election. That is the only remedy if we are going to protect democracy in this village.” His office launched a probe of “irregularities and effective voter suppression in the Village of South Blooming Grove” after he received constituent complaints about the election. Earlier today, he sent out a release publicizing his November letter to James where he called on her to pursue a little-known legal proceeding known as “quo warranto” that would allow her to formally challenge the local electeds’ right to hold office. That includes Village Mayor George Kalaj and trustees Abraham Weiss and Yitzchok Feldman, all of whom won the Oct. 22 election where just 132 votes were cast, Skoufis said. “The picture that continues to emerge is alarming: mounting violations of Village Law, Municipal Home Rule Law, Elections Law, Open Meetings Law, and more, unequivocally pointing to South Blooming Grove officials undermining free and fair elections on October 22,” Skoufis said in his letter to James. The Village of South Blooming Grove responded to a set of inquiries Playbook sent to the mayor and deputy clerk with a statement that the election was conducted “in full accordance with all applicable laws and procedures” and that it welcomes “the opportunity to share the complete record” with James’ office. “The Village has already provided extensive documentation related to the election process and will continue to cooperate fully with any agency seeking additional information,” said the statement, which was sent by the law firm Monaco Cooper Lamme & Carr. “The Village is committed to transparency and looks forward to assisting in any review to ensure full confidence in the integrity of the process.” Skoufis said the reports he received about the impropriety of the election were confirmed during a phone call he had with the village’s deputy clerk, Isaac Ekstein. “The short answer to why we changed from March to October: There was a lot of people on the outside trying to do a lot of shit,” Ekstein told Skoufis via phone, according to the letter he sent to James. “We did everything that we had to do,” Ekstein allegedly told Skoufis. “We made our research and it [October 22, 2025] was less time for anyone to organize to bring in a yeshiva here [laughter from Mr. Ekstein]... the main reason why is all the yeshivas are still closed in October. And I want to keep it at that.” The attorney general’s office said it received Skoufis’ letter and is reviewing the matter. The state lawmaker also charges that the village gave its residents notice for a meeting on whether to hold the election on a new date by physically posting a notice at Village Hall just one hour before the meeting started. A special election on the referendum to move the date of the election was ultimately held on June 23, where 71 people voted. “I had no idea, just as almost everyone didn't have any idea, that there was even an election that took place on October 22,” Skoufis told Playbook. “It only started really popping up on my radar when I got one or two calls from local residents, basically asking me, ‘Is it true that an election just happened in my village?’ The only people who were alerted to the election were seemingly a very small circle of supporters of the incumbent village administration.” Even before their alleged election shenanigans, Skoufis said the village leadership was engaged in “a significant amount of impropriety” over the years. That includes, according to Skoufis, an “improper” contract the village has with a sanitation company that was probed by the state comptroller’s office and plans to build “thousands” of additional housing units “in spite of the fact that they are literally trucking in water near daily because they do not have sufficient water to serve their existing residents,” he said. The village did not respond to Skoufis’ charges related to its sanitation contract, but said the statement about the effect of development on water supply is “inaccurate.” “Every new development in South Blooming Grove is required to provide its own independent water supply and cannot rely on existing Village sources,” the village said. Skoufis said of Ekstein and Joel Stern, another man Skoufis’ office said serves as the mayor’s assistant “have run the village of South Blooming Grove, since taking control, as the wild west.” “They have run the village with an iron fist,” Skoufis said. — Jason Beeferman
|
Comments
Post a Comment