Welcome to POLITICO’s West Wing Playbook, your guide to the people and power centers in the Biden administration. With help from producer Raymond Rapada. Send tips | Subscribe here | Email Eli | Email Lauren The White House is dialing up pressure on Hill negotiators to deliver a deal on border security. Top White House and Biden administration officials have been working the phones daily, urging the bipartisan team of senators to forge ahead and cut a deal to get Ukraine funding across the finish line, according to several senators involved in the negotiations and three people familiar with the talks. The push from the White House is being internalized as a clear sign that President JOE BIDEN urgently wants a deal done. At stake is a nearly $106 billion request the administration has made for aid to Israel, Ukraine, Taiwan and for border security. The White House has viewed the money as critical, as the president manages crises at home and abroad. “[The White House] desperately wants Ukraine aid, and they also want ‘credible fear’ changes,” said one person familiar with the talks, referring to a change in asylum law that would ultimately deny more migrants the opportunity to apply for asylum in the U.S. Several Republicans also said the White House has been more involved in conversations, particularly since last week’s Thanksgiving recess. Sen. THOM TILLIS of North Carolina said “there has been some discussion, including some discussion with JAMES [LANKFORD],” the group’s top Republican negotiator. “I suspect that there has been encouraging discussions among Democrats.” Sen. CHRIS MURPHY of Connecticut, the chief Democratic negotiator, confirmed the outreach has increased recently, “by necessity.” “We’re talking with the administration a lot more” than on other recent Hill negotiations, such as last year’s bipartisan gun agreement, he said. “But the law’s more complicated and the stakes are frankly higher.” This week has unveiled just how challenging it will be to deliver on Biden’s $106 billion request. Republicans have continued to raise demands for more border policy reforms, while immigrant advocates and progressives warn that Democrats aren’t getting anything in return, such as a deal for Dreamers and DACA recipients. As the risk of the deal crumbling heightens, deputy chief of staff NATALIE QUILLIAN is among the officials involved in Hill engagement from the White House, two people familiar with the calls told West Wing Playbook. Homeland Security Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS has also been calling senators. “It seems like there is a little bit of difference of opinion between the White House and what [Democratic] senators are trying to negotiate,” said another person familiar with the talks. “The White House is like, let’s just get this done.” White House assistant press secretary ANGELO FERNÁNDEZ-HERNÁNDEZ said the administration has followed the negotiation’s progress “closely and provided technical assistance as requested.” “Any characterization of the White House’s view of the negotiations in the Senate should be considered suspect and supplied by people who do not speak on behalf of the President or his Administration,” he said in a statement. Just how much the White House is willing to give up on the border in order to secure foreign aid remains the billion dollar question. Biden officials are pushing aggressively on changes to raise the credible fear standard on asylum claims — a tweak to the current law’s language could in theory mean fewer migrants are able to demonstrate a fear of persecution, torture or returning to their country and, therefore, more being denied the opportunity to apply for asylum. Some officials have also expressed openness to third safe country agreements, which would prevent people from applying for asylum in the U.S. if they failed to first apply in Mexico or another country they passed through initially, according to two people familiar with the talks. Changes to the humanitarian “parole” system have caused the most heartburn inside the administration and among Hill Democrats. “The linchpin of their border management strategy is creating legal pathways. If that is yanked away from them, then they’re really not left with a whole lot more they can do,” said one former administration official on Biden’s use of humanitarian parole. But advocates remain concerned that there isn’t a definitive red line on parole and other border policy changes for the White House — that the desire to get Ukraine aid will override other considerations; that the administration quietly wants to neutralize the border as a political issue heading into an election year. “My own sense is that their cold hard calculation is, this will help us as we start gearing up for the elections of 2024, and it matters that we appear to be tough on issues related to asylum and the humanitarian parole program,” the second person familiar with the talks said. “You know, fuck the reality of what this is and what this isn’t, and the long-term impact in the immigration ecosystem.” “But is this really the way we’re going to negotiate on difficult issues going forward? You can’t put the genie back in the bottle.” MESSAGE US — Are you ROSE PETOSKEY, senior adviser to the office of intergovernmental affairs and director of tribal affairs? We want to hear from you. And we’ll keep you anonymous! Email us at westwingtips@politico.com. Did someone forward this email to you? Subscribe here!
|
Comments
Post a Comment