EEOC, AI AND HR: The federal agency tasked with enforcing workplace equity has made clear it wants to guide businesses on how to deal with AI, with the aim of avoiding having to seek relief in court — and it may be able to do more with its new Democratic majority. Employers, meanwhile, are watching the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s AI moves with caution. “This is really a new civil rights frontier,” EEOC Chair Charlotte Burrows said at a Brookings Institution event Wednesday. Now, with a Democratic majority, Burrows might have an easier time revising the so-called uniform guidelines for employee selection procedures — the hiring guidelines for employers provided by the federal government, which haven’t been updated since the 1970s, said Victoria Lipnic, former acting GOP EEOC chair and a partner at Resolution Economics. Lipnic said changes to the procedures need not necessarily come on partisan lines, given bipartisan interest on the commission about addressing AI. But having a partisan majority could make securing support for changes easier, especially given that any revisions would have to go through other federal entities that co-own the procedures, including the Justice Department. Businesses in general don’t want agencies to “over-tinker” with their existing authority in making rules for AI, said Jordan Crenshaw of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's Technology Engagement Center. And employers want the ability to provide input, he said. The chamber hasn’t put out a position on whether they’d support a change to the hiring procedures regarding AI, a spokesperson said. An EEOC spokesperson didn’t immediately provide a response Friday to whether the commission was considering it. The EEOC previously put out technical guidance on how employer use of AI could violate the Americans with Disabilities Act, as well as on how the use of automated systems must not violate the provision in the Civil Rights Act protecting employers and job applicants from discrimination. The agency has also said employers’ use of AI will be among the areas receiving scrutiny in the next several years. “Employers are very attentive to what the EEOC is doing and saying in this space,” Lipnic said. But what the EEOC has put out so far — that employers must be compliant with existing laws — is “not exactly a headline,” said Michael Lotito, co-chair of the Workplace Policy Institute at the employer-side firm Littler Mendelson. That leaves plenty of room to figure out how employers actually can discriminate using AI, and who should be held accountable. “People’s attention tends to come about as a result of some kind of cataclysmic event,” Lotito said. “AI is the new toy, and I’m sure that the employment lawyers and the regulators will have a great time playing with it.” GOOD MORNING. It’s Monday, Oct. 23. Welcome back to Morning Shift, your go-to tipsheet on labor and employment-related immigration. It’s been 223 days since the Senate received Julie Su’s nomination. Send Halloween costume inspo, feedback, tips and exclusives to nniedzwiadek@politico.com and oolander@politico.com. Follow us on X, formerly known as Twitter, at @NickNiedz and @oliviaolanderr.
|
Comments
Post a Comment