One day, people recovering from substance use disorder could take a pill that significantly reduces their chance of relapsing. Such a possibility has Nora Volkow, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, excited about a better scientific understanding of addiction — as the United States continues to grapple with a record number of overdose deaths. Volkow, who has led NIDA for more than two decades, talked with Carmen about the evolving science. This interview has been edited for length and clarity. How has an understanding of the science of addiction changed during your career? When I first started doing brain imaging to investigate which areas of the brain were affected by drugs, we were very limited. Now what we are doing is recognizing that the brain is this extraordinarily complex network. Addiction involves and disrupts multiple networks, so it’s not just the dysfunction of the reward system but also the way it interacts with the brain’s executive control and emotional networks. The imaging allows us to look into how people with substance use disorders differ from one another. We have tools that allow us to affect the way the brain works. And we can do that either invasively or noninvasively through neuromodulation. So you can put an electrode in the main reward center in the brain and then stimulate it, and that appears to reduce relapse. Are there any new drugs in development that could help people with substance use disorder? There’s one a lot of people are taking for obesity and diabetes: a glucagon-like peptide receptor medication. People taking it say they don't have the urge to drink or they have a much-reduced desire to smoke cigarettes or take drugs. Researchers are also working with monoclonal antibodies against fentanyl and monoclonal antibodies against methamphetamine that could potentially be used to prevent someone from relapsing or to reverse an overdose. Is any monoclonal antibody in the late stage of clinical development? They are in Phase I, Phase II trials. So that is early. There’s a lot of work that needs to be done to ensure that a drug is safe and effective. The effectiveness is ultimately determined by the FDA, and that can be challenging if the FDA says, “We want abstinence as the outcome.” Abstinence is incredibly difficult to achieve. We have interventions that reduce drug consumption, but people would still occasionally use drugs. So they were not abstinent, and that kills the product.
|
Comments
Post a Comment