FIRST IN PI: BGR’s public relations arm has stopped working for controversial Chinese lidar maker Hesai Group, a BGR spokesperson told Daniel. Hesai, which was recently placed on a Pentagon entity list denoting ties to the Chinese military, was also dropped as a client of Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld last week after PI reported that several members of Congress were considering banning lobbying firms that represented such Chinese clients from meetings. — The severing of business ties between BGR PR and Hesai happened recently. BGR did not lobby for Hesai, but did work on communications, including hosting POLITICO last fall at its offices for an interview with Hesai CEO David Li soon after Hesai had hired BGR. — Hesai, which did not respond to requests for comment, makes sensors used in self-driving cars and has been the target of a lobbying campaign run by its competitors in the United States. Hesai customers have included robotaxi companies Cruise — which is backed by General Motors — and Zoox, along with automated trucking company Kodiak Robotics. — Two people familiar with the matter told PI that Hesai was not happy with BGR’s performance in getting stories written about the company and made the decision in early January to not renew the contract, which the BGR spokesperson disputed. — APCO Worldwide started working for Hesai in January, according to one of the people familiar with the matter, who were granted anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue. A spokesperson for APCO Worldwide didn't respond to a request for comment. — Hesai is challenging its inclusion on the DOD list and said in a press release in early February that it plans to file a lawsuit to get itself removed. “We believe this inclusion is unjust, capricious, and meritless,” Li said in the release, adding that “Hesai products are for civilian use only” and contending that the Pentagon’s move “undermines fair competition and ultimately imperils Americans’ safety by delaying and impeding the adoption of technology that could otherwise reduce the number of vehicle accidents and save lives.” ANNALS OF CAMPAIGN FINANCE: “A Pennsylvania man on Thursday pleaded guilty to federal fraud charges following a 2020 POLITICO investigation into a super PAC that said it was spending millions of dollars in battleground Senate races but didn’t actually exist,” our Zach Montellaro reports. — “The Department of Justice on Thursday announced that Christopher Richardson pleaded guilty to two charges stemming from fabricated transactions from a super PAC — one count of making a ‘false entry in a record’ for the falsities submitted to the FEC, and one count of ‘access device fraud’ for credit card fraud. He will be sentenced in June and faces a maximum of 20 years in prison for the former charge and 10 years for the latter, but such a severe sentence is unlikely.” — “A separate release from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for Washington noted that the ‘quick fundraising and spending attracted media scrutiny, questioning the veracity of the FEC reports.’” — “POLITICO reported nearly four years ago on Americans for Progressive Action USA, a super PAC that presented itself as a new, major player in elections. In filings to the Federal Election Commission, the organization said it raised over $4.8 million from a small handful of unknown donors in its first quarterly campaign filing. Then it told the FEC in late April 2020 that it was imminently dropping millions on advertising in key Senate races across the country.” — “Such a move would have been a big splash in the world of high-dollar political spending from an entirely unknown organization. But POLITICO’s reporting unveiled that AFPA and its millions in spending were, in fact, a phantom.” — “A long list of inconsistencies — like a seemingly fabricated list of vendors creating a multi-million advertising spree and untraceable donors — called into question the validity of the group. Richardson ‘used fictitious names’ for the super PAC’s officers to create the organization, and the ‘non-existent’ donations were ‘from several fictitious individuals,’ according to the press release from the Department of Justice.” CRYPTO TO THE RESCUE: “In the final days of a hard-fought Democratic primary for an open congressional seat in Texas, a wave of glowing TV ads began running in Dallas in support of state Rep. Julie Johnson, one of the top two candidates,” the Daily Beast’s Sam Brodey writes. — “‘Democrat Julie Johnson is a Texas trailblazer,’ the ad’s narrator said, touting Johnson’s record on gun reform and abortion rights, her endorsements from leaders like Beto O’Rourke, and the possibility she could be the first openly gay member of Congress from the South.” — “The ad was paid for by Protect Progress — a super PAC funded by cryptocurrency industry figures — which spent nearly $1 million to air the spot this week ahead of the primary election on Tuesday, according to federal campaign finance records. The late investment could prove critical for Johnson, who is locked in a close battle for first place in the primary with Brian Williams, a prominent Dallas trauma surgeon.” — “But the super PAC’s move to boost Johnson was hardly a coincidence. It came after Johnson added language to her campaign website that signaled her support for cryptocurrency and her desire to pass legislation in Congress that would spur ‘crypto innovation.’”
|
Comments
Post a Comment