WILL JEFFRIES’ GREEN CARD MAKE ITS RETURN? For the second time this Congress, House Democrats are wielding unexpected control over the fate of a GOP speaker. And they’re giving very few clues to how they might use that leverage. As Speaker Mike Johnson faces conservative resistance on his complicated – and still murky – maneuver to pass a multi-part foreign aid package this week, he’s going to need Democratic votes to start floor debate on the legislation. And as high as the renewed pressure is on the House to pass foreign aid after Iran’s weekend attack on Israel, Democrats are far from committed to bailing out the speaker. Why is that? For starters, lawmakers are still waiting to see the text of the package sending aid to Ukraine, Taiwan and Israel, along with details on the procedural moves Johnson plans to employ to get it across the Capitol. Until they get assurances that the bills include their priorities on security assistance to Israel, Ukraine and Taiwan – as well as humanitarian assistance for civilians in Gaza – House Democratic leaders aren’t settling on how to handle the vote setting up floor debate. Some in their ranks, however, are hinting that they don’t mind Johnson taking a tortured path as long as they get what they want in the end. “Those of us who've been around here for a while … know the process doesn't always work out the way that I prefer,” said Rep. Jim Costa (D-Calif.), who predicted “bipartisan support” for the final package if the bills included their priorities. Other Democrats are clearly still frustrated and not yet at the acceptance stage when it comes to the House GOP’s perennial chaos. “We've been talking about this for a long, long time. They don't know what the hell they're doing,” said the top Democrat on the Rules Committee, Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.). “It just shows they’re in disarray.” Important flashback: It’s unprecedented to see the minority party help the House majority pass a rule for debate, but these Democrats have done it before – stepping in last year to help then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy start debate on a bipartisan deal to hike the debt ceiling. In a dramatic moment, most Democrats held off on casting their votes until Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries held up a green voting card, giving a signal to his party to vote yes on debating the debt bill. But that moment ended up critically damaging McCarthy within his own conference, effectively numbering his days as speaker after showing his reliance on Democrats. The memory of it could weigh on Johnson, who’s already facing his own ouster threat. So would Democrats save Johnson’s job? For now, party leaders aren’t engaging on that question either. It didn’t come up during their private caucus meeting Tuesday morning, though some Democrats have signaled for weeks that they could step in to help Johnson if he put Ukraine aid up for a vote. (Remember, Democrats didn’t step in to salvage McCarthy’s leadership job after he repeatedly denied needing their help to stay speaker.) “We can’t control the theatrics of [Rep.] Marjorie Taylor Greene and the House Republican conference, but we stand ready and willing to work with anyone who wants to deliver on that help and support,” Democratic Caucus Chair Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) told reporters Tuesday. And Rep. Annie Kuster (D-N.H.), chair of the centrist New Democrat coalition, said her party was “focused right now on substance over process.” Yet if Johnson ultimately brought a satisfactory Ukraine bill to the House floor, she said, “I would have no reason to” vote to remove Johnson. At a House Armed Services Committee hearing Tuesday, Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) openly told Army leaders that Democrats could ride to Johnson's rescue: “there [are] a bunch of Democrats that are willing to have a conversation about helping in that scenario if it means we get the supplemental through this week.” Regardless of whether and when Greene (R-Ga.) might move to boot Johnson, there isn’t a Republican in line to replace him just yet. The MAGA firebrand is also hinting that she wants a clear plan in place to avoid the embarrassing leadership scramble that the House GOP descended into last fall. “This needs to be a much more controlled process than it was last time. I think that's the right thing for the conference, the right thing for the House,” Greene, who’s sponsoring the motion to vacate, said Tuesday. She added: “This time it doesn’t need to be that way. So I'm being responsible with this decision, and allowing people to come to terms about who would be the next speaker … No one has stepped up yet.” — Nicholas Wu and Daniella Diaz, with assist from Joe Gould GOOD EVENING! Welcome to Inside Congress, the play-by-play guide to all things Capitol Hill, on this Tuesday, April 16, where we’re enjoying the sun.
|
Comments
Post a Comment