POLICY AGENDA OPTIONAL Leading liberals in Congress are all in for Vice President Kamala Harris, policy promises or no policy promises. The veep’s sudden rise to the top of the ticket means the Congressional Progressive Caucus and others on the left flank of the Democratic Party can’t exert their usual quadrennial leverage — the leftward pull of a traditional primary season. Instead, the few policy moves Harris has made have been all about recalibrating from her ill-fated 2020 presidential campaign, where she tilted far to the left on immigration, criminal justice and other issues. Since launching her presidential run, she has instead hewed closely to Biden’s more moderate agenda in her early speeches and ads, issuing few specifics. No promises, no worries: Progressives aren’t sweating Harris’ move to the center. Rep. Pramila Jayapal, who leads the roughly 100-member CPC, will lead a “Progressives for Harris” call on Monday night, along with such members as Reps. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), Becca Balint (D-Vt.) and more. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) will also join the call after campaigning for Harris in North Carolina this week. The early show of support, they say, is an acknowledgment that it’s all about beating Donald Trump — and that Harris has to win the White House for any intraparty policy squabbles to matter. “We have 100 days here,” one senior House progressive aide said. “Winning is what matters.” That will be true regardless of who Harris picks as her running mate, we’re told: Progressives, particular labor leaders, have been skeptical of both Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro and Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly, but Hill sources tell us neither pick would cause a liberal revolt in Congress. Only Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) is conspicuously not all-in for Harris. He has been stumping for the VP in New Hampshire and Maine this week while withholding a formal endorsement as he continues to seek promises on a “working class” agenda, including expanding Medicare to cover dental and vision, lifting the income cap on Social Security and limiting rent increases. But, so far, he’s given no indication he’ll abandon Harris if his demands aren’t met. Big picture, by design: Harris is unlikely to roll out a point-by-point policy agenda, a la Hillary Clinton in 2016 or Elizabeth Warren in 2020, anytime soon. Democratic veterans of tough races say that’s for the best. “Campaigns that focus on point-by-point policy rollouts are losing elections, period,” one Democratic strategist who works on congressional races said. “Tell me a real voter who wants a policy plan and not a D.C. insider who works at some think tank or advocacy group who wants to claim credit for it.” That’s especially true given who she is running against. “It’s not that kind of election,” a senior Democratic aide said. Coming soon, messaging copycats: Hill Democrats have observed, with relief, that the biggest focus of Harris’s speeches so far has been the economy. She talks up expanding paid family leave, child care and elder care — all issues that the party tried and failed to address early in the Biden administration. One Democrat called it a big — and welcome — change from the Mike Donilon messaging era, referring to the top Biden strategist who is fond of soaring messages and searing warnings about democracy. Some are especially pleased to hear Harris talk about housing. In her recent Atlanta speech, Harris vowed to go after “the high cost of living,” promising that her Day 1 priorities would be to “take on corporate landlords and cap unfair rent increases.” Expect to see this as a major focus of Hill Democrats' campaigns heading into November, too — details or no.
|
Comments
Post a Comment