SCOTUS SCUTTLEBUTT: President Joe Biden on Friday formally announced Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, 51, as his selection to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer. The move was not unexpected. After all, just last year, Biden tapped her to fill now-Attorney General Merrick Garland's seat on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, considered the second-most influential court in the country. Jackson has all the top-flight credentials expected of a modern Justice — including previously clerking for Breyer, for an added dose of symmetry. (You may recall that also was a point in Brett Kavanaugh's favor when Anthony Kennedy retired in 2018.) Unions wasted little time joining other Democrat-allied groups in praising the selection: "Judge Brown Jackson has a long record of protecting the constitutional rights of workers and everyday people," Sarah Nelson, head of the Association of Flight Attendants, said in a statement that was echoed by several others. Some labor activists had expressed reservations about one of the other candidates on Biden's SCOTUS shortlist, J. Michelle Childs, given her professional background at law firm that represented corporate clients in discrimination and sexual harrassment suits. Having only been on the circuit court since mid-June, Jackson did not accumulate an extensive record as an appellate judge. In early February, however, she did author the opinion nixing a Trump-era effort from the Federal Labor Relations Authority to expand the types of workplace changes government agencies can make outside of collective bargaining. Prior to that, she also served for several years as a district court judge in D.C. and had several labor and immigration-related cases come before her. Jackson shot down executive orders from then-President Donald Trump to constrain the power of federal employee unions, as well as a bid to fast-track deportation of undocumented immigrations. However, both of those rulings were overturned by a higher court— blemishes that are already being raised by Republicans opposed to her nomination. But she did side with the Trump administration in a case brought by environmental groups seeking to forestall the creation of a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. Jackson has also spoken about the difficulty of being a working mother earlier in her career when she was an attorney at a corporate law firm. And a fun fact: Jackson is an erstwhile member of the Fourth Estate. Her first job out of college was at TIME Magazine in the early '90s. NO SIGNS OF INFLATION SPIRAL, YET: Prices are up. So are wages. So far, economists say, they're not feeding off of each other in a significant way — meaning the country is avoiding the self-perpetuating wage-price spiral that gutted the economy when inflation surged in the 1970s, Eleanor reports. To be sure: Economists and policymakers in Washington are watching closely for signs that could soon change. If it does, inflation risks spiking even more dramatically than it has already, frustrating voters and dealing Democrats a weak hand to play just months before the midterm elections. Historical context: The '70s wage-price spiral was seeded by a surge in government spending to fund the Vietnam War and President Lyndon Johnson's social policy agenda. Consumer demand rose and, in turn, prices — yet former President Richard Nixon pressured the Federal Reserve not to intercede ahead of the 1972 election, keeping interest rates low. Eventually, employers and employees foresaw nothing but rising costs and began planning for price and wage increases, which drove each to new heights. How this time is different: Declining union membership and growing import competition could help head off the same cycle this time around. And the Fed is poised to raise interest rates next month. But inflation concerns are great enough that calls for the central bank to act more decisively have grown louder, including from Democrats like Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), who asserted that the Fed needs to "stop pussyfooting around."
|
Comments
Post a Comment