'RIPPLE EFFECTS' FOR U.S. FOREIGN AID — When the U.S. sneezes, the whole world can catch a cold, an activist with an abortion-rights group in Malawisaid on a recent visit to Washington. The impact of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade is quickly spreading across the world, said Bethany Van Kampen, a senior legal and policy adviser at the same organization, Ipas. "When it comes to family planning and reproductive health, the U.S. is the largest government donor. And of course, that is going to create ripple effects," she told Global Pulse. A chill over a freeze: U.S. foreign-aid rules, such as the Helms amendment, prohibit governments from using U.S. assistance to fund abortions as a method of family planning. Another one, the Mexico City Policy, or the Global Gag Rule — which changes depending on which party governs the White House — bars foreign nongovernmental organizations from performing or promoting abortion as a condition of U.S. funding. Those rules already cause "an incredible chilling effect in countries that are receiving U.S. foreign assistance, and so you can imagine that with this decision, that chill will become worse," Van Kampen said. Even before the Roe ruling, countries receiving U.S. aid were afraid of doing anything related to abortion for fear of losing that money, she said. The Mexico City Policy's most recent implementation, under the Trump administration, led to reduced family planning and reproductive health service provisions, less access to trusted providers and a reduced trust in the U.S. government, the Government Accountability Office said in aMay report. Some organizations in countries like Malawi, Mozambique and Zimbabwe didn't even know the rule was revoked by President Joe Biden in January 2021 until researchers from pro-abortion organization Fòs Feminista spoke to themfor a study released in April 2022, said Serra Sippel, the organization's chief global advocacy officer. With Roe's fall, Sippel fears such policies will be harsher. But Brian Clowes, the director of research and training at Human Life International, an anti-abortion group, doesn't believe the Roe decision would impact U.S. foreign funding for sexual and reproductive health, which he would like to see repurposed. "If we really want to save the lives of Africans, we ditch the birth control devices, we ditch the abortion and all the rest of it, and spend all this money on clean drinking water," he told Global Pulse. Being clearer: Sippel and Van Kampen argue that the U.S. Agency for International Development must communicate to the entities it funds how they can use U.S. aid. A USAID spokesperson said the agency routinely communicates with staff managing global health grants and training at USAID and its partners. The Biden administration remains "just as committed as we ever were to sexual rights and health," said Atul Gawande, USAID's assistant administrator for global health, speaking at a Foreign Policy event Tuesday.
|
Comments
Post a Comment