A GENE-EDITING BREAKTHROUGH — Expert advisers will consider today how two companies assessed potential risks with their proposed first-ever gene-editing treatment for sickle cell disease, a rare condition that disproportionately affects people of color. The therapy uses a groundbreaking gene-editing technique known as CRISPR to modify the stem cells of patients with the disease and is in line to be the first such treatment approved for sickle cell disease. An FDA decision is expected by Dec. 8. The companies behind the candidate drug, Vertex Pharmaceuticals and CRISPR Therapeutics, have also applied for the therapy to be indicated for another rare blood condition, transfusion-dependent beta thalassemia. Up for discussion: “It is unclear whether the analysis using this limited sample size will provide for an adequate understanding of the potential risk of off-target editing,” a phenomenon in which the therapy edits a gene that isn’t the focus of the treatment, FDA reviewers said in a briefing document released ahead of the meeting. The agency is asking members of its independent advisory committee on cell, tissue and gene therapies to discuss whether the companies’ off-target analysis was adequate to evaluate risk and whether more studies are warranted. The big question is whether FDA advisers will favor additional studies, and if so, whether they should be conducted before or after approval. The discussion topic isn’t subject to a vote, so the agency will have no formal recommendation to consider. Still, the debate will inform the FDA’s decision on whether the treatment, dubbed exa-cel, should be approved this year. Investment banking firm William Blair called the briefing document “a near-best-case scenario” for the companies in a Friday research note, nodding toward the treatment’s status as the first CRISPR-based therapy to be considered for FDA approval. The other looming issue is how or whether insurers would cover the treatment if approved. It likely would be available to anywhere from 10,000 to 20,000 sickle cell patients with severe disease — a much larger patient pool than for other rare diseases with FDA-approved gene therapies, according to Stephen Majors of the advocacy group Alliance for Regenerative Medicine. Gene therapies are typically intended to be curative, meaning their one-time or limited use can command million-dollar price tags. The nonprofit Institute for Clinical and Economic Review found that exca-cel and bluebird bio’s genetic treatments for sickle cell disease would be cost-effective between $1.35 million and $2.05 million. IT’S TUESDAY. WELCOME BACK TO PRESCRIPTION PULSE. Congratulations to our Katherine Ellen Foley for finishing the Marine Corps Marathon! It was a brutal weather day for a 26.2 mile race; we’re so proud of her! Send news, tips and cool weather vibes to Lauren Gardner (lgardner@politico.com or @Gardner_LM), David Lim (dlim@politico.com or @davidalim) and Katherine Ellen Foley (kfoley@politico.com or @katherineefoley). TODAY ON OUR PULSE CHECK PODCAST, host Chelsea Cirruzzo talks with POLITICO health care reporter Ben Leonard, who breaks down President Joe Biden's executive order directing HHS to develop guidelines and oversight for the use of AI in health care and explains the order's potential impact.
|
Comments
Post a Comment